+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

An ethnographic exploration of influences on prescribing in general practice: why is there variation in prescribing practices?



An ethnographic exploration of influences on prescribing in general practice: why is there variation in prescribing practices?



Implementation Science 8: 72



Prescribing is a core activity for general practitioners, yet significant variation in the quality of prescribing has been reported. This suggests there may be room for improvement in the application of the current best research evidence. There has been substantial investment in technologies and interventions to address this issue, but effect sizes so far have been small to moderate. This suggests that prescribing is a decision-making process that is not sufficiently understood. By understanding more about prescribing processes and the implementation of research evidence, variation may more easily be understood and more effective interventions proposed. An ethnographic study in three Scottish general practices with diverse organizational characteristics. Practices were ranked by their performance against Audit Scotland prescribing quality indicators, incorporating established best research evidence. Two practices of high prescribing quality and one practice of low prescribing quality were recruited. Participant observation, formal and informal interviews, and a review of practice documentation were employed. Practices ranked as high prescribing quality consistently made and applied macro and micro prescribing decisions, whereas the low-ranking practice only made micro prescribing decisions. Macro prescribing decisions were collective, policy decisions made considering research evidence in light of the average patient, one disease, condition, or drug. Micro prescribing decisions were made in consultation with the patient considering their views, preferences, circumstances and other conditions (if necessary).Although micro prescribing can operate independently, the implementation of evidence-based, quality prescribing was attributable to an interdependent relationship. Macro prescribing policy enabled prescribing decisions to be based on scientific evidence and applied consistently where possible. Ultimately, this influenced prescribing decisions that occur at the micro level in consultation with patients. General practitioners in the higher prescribing quality practices made two different 'types' of prescribing decision; macro and micro. Macro prescribing informs micro prescribing and without a macro basis to draw upon the low-ranked practice had no effective mechanism to engage with, reflect on and implement relevant evidence. Practices that recognize these two levels of decision making about prescribing are more likely to be able to implement higher quality evidence.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036946917

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23799906

DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-72


Related references

Prescribing antidepressants in general practice. Prescribing rates vary widely between practices. BMJ 314(7083): 828, 1997

Antimicrobial prescribing in post-graduate training practices: a cross-sectional study of prescribing data in general practices in England. Education for Primary Care 29(3): 139-143, 2018

Prescribing indicators. Development and validation of guideline-based prescribing indicators as an instrument to measure the variation in the prescribing behaviour of general practitioners. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 60(10): 739-746, 2004

Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. BMJ 313(7057): 595-599, 1996

Controversies in primary care. Setting prescribing budgets in general practice. Effective prescribing at practice level should be identified and rewarded. BMJ 316(7133): 750-753, 1998

Influences on prescribing in non-fundholding general practices. British Journal of General Practice 46(406): 287-290, 1996

Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study. BMJ 343: D6788, 2011

Age, sex, and temporary resident originated prescribing units (ASTRO-PUs): new weightings for analysing prescribing of general practices in England. BMJ 307(6902): 485-488, 1993

Specific therapeutic group age-sex related prescribing units (STAR-PUs): weightings for analysing general practices' prescribing in England. BMJ 311(7011): 991-994, 1995

Prescribing antidepressants in general practice. Prescribing is short-term and follow up poor. BMJ 314(7083): 828, 1997

The Nelson general practice prescribing project. Part II: Prescribing reports for self audit. New Zealand Medical Journal 103(902): 560-562, 1990

Prescribing in general practice. A review by the RCGP Prescribing Fellow in Scotland. Occasional Paper 1991(54): 1-36, 1991

The Australian general practice morbidity and prescribing survey, 1969 to 1974. 6. Prescribing: antibiotics. Medical Journal of Australia 2(L Suppl): 24-25, 1976

Comparison of prescribing unit with index including both age and sex in assessing general practice prescribing costs. BMJ 306(6876): 496-498, 1993

Cost-effective prescribing in general practice: Patients' attitudes to financially motivated prescribing changes. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 8(1): 27-32, 2000