+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes



Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes



Bjog 121(6): 674-85; Discussion 685



Recent literature on the effect of induction of labour (compared with expectant management) has provided conflicting results. Reviews of observational studies generally report an increase in the rate of caesarean section, whereas reviews of post-dates and term prelabour rupture of membrane (PROM trials suggest either no difference or a reduction in risk. To evaluate with a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) whether or not the induction of labour increases the risk of caesarean section in women with intact membranes. Literature search using electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials. RCTs comparing a policy of induction of labour with expectant management in women with intact membranes. A total of 37 trials were identified and reviewed. Quantitative analyses with fixed- and random-effects models were performed with revman 5.1. Of the 37 RCTs, 27 were trials of uncomplicated pregnancies at 37-42 weeks of gestation. The remaining ten evaluated induction versus expectant management in pregnancies with suspected macrosomia (two), diabetes in pregnancy (one), oligohydramnios (one), twins (two), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (two), mild pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) (one), and women with a high-risk score for caesarean section (one). Meta-analysis of 31 trials determined that a policy of induction was associated with a reduction in the risk of caesarean section compared with expectant management (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.92). Induction of labour in women with intact membranes reduces the risk of caesarean section. Review of the trials suggests that this effect may arise from non-treatment effects, and that additional trials are needed.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036962135

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23834460

DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12328


Related references

Chewing gum in preventing postoperative ileus in women undergoing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bjog 121(7): 793-9; Discussion 799, 2014

Induction of labour for suspected macrosomia at term in non-diabetic women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Bjog 124(3): 414-421, 2017

Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj Open 9(3): E025356, 2019

Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review. Bjog 113(12): 1366-1376, 2006

Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Bjog 118(4): 391-399, 2011

Concerning the timing of antibiotic administration in women undergoing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj Open 3(4):, 2013

Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials. Bjog 123(9): 1501-1508, 2016

Can we predict the risk of caesarean section in induction of labour (IOL) for postdates in nulliparous women?. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 97(Suppl 1): A95.2-A95, 2012

O344 Elective Induction Of Labour In Parous Women And The Risk Of Caesarean Section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 119: S381-S382, 2012

Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cmaj 186(9): 665-673, 2014

Elective induction of labour increases caesarean section rate in low risk multiparous women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32(3): 257-259, 2012

The impact of neuraxial clonidine on postoperative analgesia and perioperative adverse effects in women having elective Caesarean section-a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 120(2): 228-240, 2018

Induction of labour for women with a previous Caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature. Australian and new Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 44(5): 392-395, 2004

A systematic review and meta-analysis of progestogen use for maintenance tocolysis after preterm labor in women with intact membranes. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 132(1): 11-16, 2016

Improving induction of labour - a quality improvement project addressing Caesarean section rates and length of process in women undergoing induction of labour. Bmj Quality Improvement Reports 4(1):, 2015