+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in goats in areas of Mexico with and without brucellosis control campaign



Prevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in goats in areas of Mexico with and without brucellosis control campaign



Tropical Animal Health and Production 45(6): 1383-1389



Brucellosis is a major constraint for small-scale goat farming systems in Mexico. This study estimated the prevalence of testing positive to brucellosis and identified and quantified risk factors in goats from small-scale farms of Michoacán that had participated in a brucellosis campaign (i.e. vaccination, serological testing, culling and awareness) and of Jalisco that had negligible brucellosis campaign participation. A cross-sectional serological survey was conducted among 1,713 goats of 83 flocks. The prevalence of testing positive to brucellosis was higher (38%) in Jalisco than in Michoacán (11%). Logistic regression analysis indicated that goats from Michoacán had lower odds to test positive for brucellosis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.48) compared to goats from Jalisco. Goats in zero-grazing systems had lower odds than goats in grazing systems (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.57). When goats were kept in pens with low density (0.002 to 0.22 goat/m(2)), odds was lower (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.67) compared to goats kept in pens with higher density (0.23 to 1 goat/m(2)). Odds was higher for testing positive when farmers bought goats from goat traders (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.15-2.87) compared to farmers who did not. If scavenger poultry had access to goat pens, the odds was half (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.83) of those where poultry had no access. Regular disinfection of the pen reduced the odds (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99) compared to where disinfection was not regular. The brucellosis control campaign was effective in reducing brucellosis seropositivity.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036974356

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23420068

DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0375-6


Related references

Case-control study of risk factors for high within-flock small-ruminant brucellosis prevalence in a brucellosis low-prevalence area. Epidemiology and Infection 132(2): 201-210, 2004

Research into contagious abortion of cattle, sheep and goats. Brucellosis in India. I. The occurrence of brucellosis in India. II. Comparative susceptibility. III. The dissemination of brucellosis in India. IV. Bacteriology of Indian strains. V. Diagnosis. VI. Brucellosis and public health. VII. The control of brucellosis in India. VIII. Specific abortion, other than brucellosis. IX. Non-specific abortion. Indian Jour Vet Sci And Animal Husbandry 18(3): 115-193, 1948

Screening Household Members of Acute Brucellosis Cases in Endemic Areas and Risk Factors for Brucellosis. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 15(8): 468-472, 2016

Seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis of goats in herds of Michoacan, Mexico. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82(3-4): 282-290, 2007

Symposium on the accelerated brucellosis control program: review of the nation wide campaign to eradicate brucellosis in domestic animals. 1955

Risk assessment and management of brucellosis in the southern greater Yellowstone area (II): Cost-benefit analysis of reducing elk brucellosis prevalence. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 134: 39-48, 2017

A cross-sectional cattle disease study in Kongor rural council, southern Sudan. I. Prevalence estimates and age, sex and breed associations for brucellosis and contagious bovine pleuropneumonia. II. Brucellosis in cows: associated factors, impact on production and disease control considerations. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 5(2): 111-123, 125-132, 1987

Risk factors for human brucellosis associated with the presence of bovine brucellosis in Correntes County, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Arquivos Do Instituto Biologico (sao Paulo): 4, 415-421, 2008

Herd prevalence of bovine brucellosis and analysis of risk factors in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas of the Kampala economic zone, Uganda. Bmc Veterinary Research 7: 60, 2012

Risk factors for brucellosis in goats in Eastern and Western Uganda. Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, August 6-11-2000: Id 454, 2000

Impact, on human brucellosis, of the campaign against bovine brucellosis in France. The peculiar case of the students of the Alfort Veterinary School. Bulletin de l'Academie Nationale de Medecine 167(6): 597-604, 1983

Prevalence studies on bovine brucellosis according to Brazilian National Program for the Control and Eradication of Bovine Brucellosis and Tuberculosis: Introduction. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia 61: 1-5, 2009

Designation of brucellosis areas specifically approved stockyards and slaughtering establishments brucellosis areas. 1977

Effect of different control programs on the prevalence of bovine brucellosis in dairy herds in Mexico. Revista de Salud Animal 26(3): 179-182, 2004

Investigation of brucellosis among cattle with regard to human infection. II. Brucellosis among goats and sheep. Indian Journal of Medical Research 54(7): 615-622, 1966