+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision



Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision



American Journal of Surgery 206(5): 771-777



The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the circumferential resection margin on the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision. Medical records from July 2004 to June 2008 were prospectively reviewed, and 348 patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for rectal cancer were identified. The influence of the circumferential resection margin on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 5-year cancer-specific survival was assessed. Of 348 patients, 13 (3.7%) had positive circumferential resection margins. During a median follow-up period of 58.0 months, 8 patients (2.3%) had local recurrence and 53 (15.2%) developed distant metastases. Local recurrence rates and distant metastasis rates in patients with positive circumferential resection margins were 15.4% and 61.5%, respectively, significantly higher than in those with negative circumferential resection margins (1.8% and 13.4%, respectively) (P < .001). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 75.8% and 0% for patients with tumors having negative and positive circumferential resection margins, respectively (P < .001). A circumferential resection margin of ≤1 mm adversely affects cancer-specific survival, local recurrence, and distant metastasis.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036981501

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23871321

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.009


Related references

Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 41(8): 979-983, 1998

Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 14(2): 462-469, 2006

Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence?. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 41(8): 979-983, 1998

Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 89(3): 327-334, 2002

Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?. Colorectal Disease 19(11): O377-O385, 2017

The circumferential margin in rectal cancer: Recommendations based on the Dutch total mesorectal excision study. European Journal of Cancer 38(7): 973-976, 2002

Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases. Colorectal Disease 16(8): 603-609, 2015

Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma. Digestive Diseases 25(1): 51-55, 2007

Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 50(9): 1324-1331, 2007

The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 48(12): 2249-2257, 2006

Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients. Colorectal Disease 20(6): O143-O151, 2018

Risk factors for circumferential R1 resection after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a study in 233 consecutive patients with mid or low rectal cancer. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 30(2): 197-203, 2015

Higher risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential margin in low rectal cancer regardless of surgical technique. Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne 9(4): 569-577, 2015

Local excision after preoperative chemoradiation results in an equivalent outcome to total mesorectal excision in selected patients with T3 rectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 17(2): 441-447, 2010

Tumor location is an independent predictive factor for distant metastasis and metastatic sites of rectal adenocarcinoma in patients receiving total mesorectal excision. Journal of Cancer 9(6): 950-958, 2018