+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Scaling relations of local magnitude versus moment magnitude for sequences of similar earthquakes in Switzerland

Scaling relations of local magnitude versus moment magnitude for sequences of similar earthquakes in Switzerland

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101.2

Theoretical considerations and empirical regressions show that, in the magnitude range between 3 and 5, local magnitude, M(L) , and moment magnitude, M(w) , scale 1:1. Previous studies suggest that for smaller magnitudes this 1:1 scaling breaks down. However, the scatter between M(L) and M(w) at small magnitudes is usually large and the resulting scaling relations are therefore uncertain. In an attempt to reduce these uncertainties, we first analyze the M(L) versus M(w) relation based on 195 events, induced by the stimulation of a geothermal reservoir below the city of Basel, Switzerland. Values of M(L) range from 0.7 to 3.4. From these data we derive a scaling of M(L) approximately 1.5M(w) over the given magnitude range. We then compare peak Wood-Anderson amplitudes to the low-frequency plateau of the displacement spectra for six sequences of similar earthquakes in Switzerland in the range of 0.5< or =M(L) < or =4.1. Because effects due to the radiation pattern and to the propagation path between source and receiver are nearly identical at a particular station for all events in a given sequence, the scatter in the data is substantially reduced. Again we obtain a scaling equivalent to M(L) approximately 1.5M(w) . Based on simulations using synthetic source time functions for different magnitudes and Q values estimated from spectral ratios between downhole and surface recordings, we conclude that the observed scaling can be explained by attenuation and scattering along the path. Other effects that could explain the observed magnitude scaling, such as a possible systematic increase of stress drop or rupture velocity with moment magnitude, are masked by attenuation along the path.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 037149111

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1785/0120100179

Related references

Comparison of magnitude estimates for New Zealand earthquakes; moment magnitude, local magnitude, and teleseismic body-wave magnitude. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99.3, 2009

Automatic computation of moment magnitudes for small earthquakes and the scaling of local to moment magnitude. Geophysical Journal International 183.1, 2010

Local magnitude, duration magnitude and seismic moment of Dahshour 1992 earthquakes. Annali di Geofisica 43(1): 95-103, 2000

Moment magnitude-local magnitude calibration for earthquakes off Canada's west coast. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(5): 2296-2300, 2003

Moment magnitude-local magnitude calibration for earthquakes in Western Canada. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(5): 1994-2000, 2005

Moment Magnitude MW and Local Magnitude ML Relationship for Earthquakes in Northeast India. Pure and Applied Geophysics 169(11): 1977-1988, 2012

Moment magnitude local magnitude relationship for the earthquakes of the Shillong-Mikir plateau, Northeastern India Region: a new perspective. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk 3(4): 365-375, 2012

Empirical relationship between moment magnitude and Nuttli magnitude for small-magnitude earthquakes in southeastern Canada. Seismological Research Letters 76(6): 752-755, 2005

Empirical Calibration of Local Magnitude Data Sets Versus Moment Magnitude in Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(4): 2227-2246, 2013

Comparison of repeating magnitude 2 earthquakes near the SAFOD Site, California, with similar-magnitude mining-induced earthquakes in South Africa. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 89.53, Suppl., 2008

Body-Wave Magnitude mb Is a Good Proxy of Moment Magnitude Mw for Small Earthquakes (mb<4.5-5.0). Seismological Research Letters 84(6): 932-937, 2013

Regional moment; magnitude relations for earthquakes and explosions. Geophysical Research Letters 20(4): 277-280, 1993

Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude. Seismological Research Letters 81.6, 2010

Magnitude-seismic moment relations for the shallow earthquakes in and around Japan. Zisin = Jishin 43(2): 257-265, 1990

Magnitude-moment-size relations for Matsushiro region earthquakes. Earthquake Notes 55(3): 18, 1984