+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources WATER; a water-budget modeling approach for managing water-supply resources in Kentucky; Phase I, Data processing, model development, and; application to non-karst areas

The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources WATER; a water-budget modeling approach for managing water-supply resources in Kentucky; Phase I, Data processing, model development, and; application to non-karst areas

Scientific Investigations Report: 34

The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) was developed in cooperation with the Kentucky Division of Water to provide a consistent and defensible method of estimating streamflow and water availability in ungaged basins. WATER is process oriented; it is based on the TOPMODEL code and incorporates historical water-use data together with physiographic data that quantitatively describe topography and soil-water storage. The result is a user-friendly decision tool that can estimate water availability in non-karst areas of Kentucky without additional data or processing. The model runs on a daily time step, and critical source data include a historical record of daily temperature and precipitation, digital elevation models (DEMs), the Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), and historical records of water discharges and withdrawals. The model was calibrated and statistically evaluated for 12 basins by comparing the estimated discharge to that observed at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations. When statistically evaluated over a 2,119-day time period, the discharge estimates showed a bias of -0.29 to 0.42, a root mean square error of 1.66 to 5.06, a correlation of 0.54 to 0.85, and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.26 to 0.72. The parameter and input modifications that most significantly improved the accuracy and precision of streamflow-discharge estimates were the addition of Next Generation radar (NEXRAD) precipitation data, a rooting depth of 30 centimeters, and a TOPMODEL scaling parameter (m) derived directly from SSURGO data that was multiplied by an adjustment factor of 0.10. No site-specific optimization was used.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 037176152

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Managing ground water resources to meet future water supply demands in a rural setting in northwestern Kentucky. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 36(3): 4, 2004

Evaluating water resources availability for population of Amur region of ground water resources supply for economic-drinking applications. Razvedka i Okhrana Nedr 2003(10): 21-22, 2003

The future water resources information requirements of the arid areas of South Australia Legal, pastoral, mining, transportation, community water supply, environmental. Proceedings The Hydrology of areas of low precipitation: 7-104, 1979

Governance of water supply systems in the Palestinian Territories: A data envelopment analysis approach to the management of water resources. Journal of Environmental Management 87(1): 80-94, 2007

Sustainable development of water resources and possible enhancement technologies and application of water supply in Jordan. Water International 20(2): 106-109, 1995

Implementation of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the administrations proposed water resources development legislation, and proposed water resources projects which have received a favorable report of the Chief of Engineers. 1989

Analysis of water resources supply and demand and security of water resources development in irrigation regions of the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin, Northwest China. Agricultural Sciences in China 5(2): 130-140, 2006

Drinking water supply from karst water resources (the example of the Kras Plateau, SW Slovenia). Acta Carsologica 33(1): 73-84, 2004

The Nations water resources, the Second National Water Assessment. IV. Water supply and water quality considerations. PB 78 (285 750), 1978

Soil science in relation to water resources development part 5 economic evaluation of water resources data. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 36(1): 187-194, 1972

Soil science in relation to water resources development. V. Economic evaluation of water resources data. 1972

Managing Water Resources Under Conditions of Scarcity: On Consumers Willingness to Pay for Improving Water Supply Infrastructure. Water Resources Management 30(5): 1723-1738, 2016

Managing the village-level open-access water resources in a region facing rapidly declining water availability. Environment, Development and Sustainability 12(6): 999-1012, 2010

National Water Summary 1984, hydrologic events, selected water-quality trends and ground-water resources; U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2275; book review. Journal of Hydrology 85(1-2): 204-205, 1986

An eco-environmental water demand based model for optimising water resources using hybrid genetic simulated annealing algorithms. Part II. Model application and results. Journal of Environmental Management 90(8): 2612-2619, 2009