+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The practical reasons why slug tests including falling and rising head tests often yield the wrong value of hydraulic conductivity

The practical reasons why slug tests including falling and rising head tests often yield the wrong value of hydraulic conductivity

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 43.3

Slug test results are usually treated with scepticism based on the idea that they are fundamentally unreliable. Based on decades of experience, this paper proposes that many tests yield erroneous values of hydraulic conductivity for straightforward practical reasons. The main cause of large errors is leakage from the interval under test both during drilling as well as post-completion. Other causes of error are misguided field procedures, unfortunate design stratagems, and misidentified test behaviour. The paper, based on real examples from various geological environments, shows how to identify problems after the event as well as how to avoid them. The major innovation suggested here is the use of the rate of change of water level, often termed the "pressure derivative", versus elevation (rather than time) as a way of identifying likely leakage. It is concluded that much of the poor procedure arises from ambiguities and omissions in the UK code of practice. The paper suggests a new set of practical guidelines to limit or measure error based on current technology and an integrated approach to test analysis. It is proposed that all future monitoring boreholes are tested with an approach designed to assess potential leakage pathways.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 037184056

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values determined by aquifer tests, specific capacity tests, slug tests, and grain size analysis. Pages 31-38 1994, 1994

Field-saturated hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils from falling-head well tests. Agricultural Water Management 79(2): 160-176, 2006

The effect of measurement scale on the worth of hydraulic conductivity data; slug tests and pumping tests. Geotechnical Special Publication 58: 1034-1051, 1996

Comparison of hydraulic conductivity estimates obtained from in-situ slug tests and packer tests conducted in fractured bedrock systems. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 26(3): 71, 1994

Slug tests and hydraulic conductivity. Ground Water Management 4: 85-99, 1990

Analysis of slug tests in formations of high hydraulic conductivity. Ground Water 41(5): 620-630, 2003

A new system for performing slug tests in formations of low hydraulic conductivity. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 31(7): 267, 1999

The use of slug tests to describe vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity. Journal of Hydrology Amsterdam 156(1/4): 137-162, 1994

Slug tests for determining hydraulic conductivity of natural geologic deposits. ASTM Special Technical Publication = American Society for Testing and Materials Special Technical Publication: Pages 95-110. 1994., 1994

Evaluating the quality of hydraulic conductivity estimates from piezometer slug tests in peat. Hydrological Processes 19(6): 1227-1244, 2005

Analyses of slug tests and hydraulic conductivity variations in the near field of a two-well tracer experiment site. Ground Water. 35(3): 492-501, 1997

Single-well interference slug tests to assess the vertical hydraulic conductivity of unconsolidated aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 478, 2013

Vertical profiles of streambed hydraulic conductivity determined using slug tests in central and western Nebraska. 2001

Determination of hydraulic conductivity with slug and bail tests in small diameter wells in the south of Vietnam. Journal of Geology, Series B 25(Pages 58-62, 2005

Local variation of hydraulic conductivity in dolomite; comparison of values determined from packer tests, pumping tests, and tracer tests. Pages 13-14 1995, 1995