+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Early-season soybean as a trap crop for stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Arkansas' changing system of soybean production



Early-season soybean as a trap crop for stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Arkansas' changing system of soybean production



Environmental Entomology 38(2): 450-458



Early-season soybean, Glycine max L. Merrill, was evaluated in Arkansas soybean fields as a trap crop for a complex of stink bug species that included Nezara viridula L., Acrosternum hilare (Say), and Euschistus servus (Say). Early-season soybean production systems (ESPSs) are composed of indeterminate soybean cultivars planted in April. In the first year of a 2-yr study, field-scale trap crops ( approximately 0.5-1.0 ha) of maturity group (MG) III and IV soybean were planted adjacent to production fields of MG V soybean. Stink bugs were attracted first to the ESPS trap crops and were twice treated with insecticide, yet damaging populations developed later in the MG V soybean adjacent to the trap crops. General sampling and observations of low stink bug densities in commercial fields of soybean and corn across the study area suggested that stink bugs were widely distributed across the agricultural landscape. These observations and the subsequent discovery of additional ESPS fields outside the study area suggested that developing populations in the adjacent MG V soybean probably did not originate from the trap crops. However the source of the populations colonizing MG V soybean could not be determined, and we concluded that the scale of future experiments should be increased to better control stink bugs dispersing from other ESPSs outside the study area. In the second year of the study, the experiment was expanded in size to a farm- or community-scale project where entire fields of ESPSs (8-32 ha) were used as trap crops. Insecticide was applied to the trap-crop fields and other fields of ESPSs within a 0.8-km radius of targeted response fields, yet again there was no apparent effect on subsequent populations of stink bugs in the MG V response fields. With the recent expansion of ESPSs in Arkansas, it may be difficult to use ESPSs as a trap crop to lower stink bug populations across large enough areas to suppress populations in late-season soybean. Also, multiple soybean cultivars are generally planted across a 2- or 3-mo period in Arkansas, which results in staggered soybean development across the landscape and extends the time period that soybean is attractive to colonizing stink bugs. Trap crops of ESPSs are only attractive for oviposition for up to 4-5 wk and cannot protect full-season soybean production systems (FSSPSs) for such an extended time period. This shift in production systems may limit the use of ESPS trap crops for management of stink bugs unless highly coordinated efforts are made to synchronize soybean maturity and control stink bugs in ESPSs across large geographic areas.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 037414161

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19389295

DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0219


Related references

Stink bugs on soybean in northeastern Brazil and a new record on the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Neotropical Entomology 31(2): 331-332, 2002

Seasonal abundance of stink bugs (Heteroptera : Pentatomidae) and other polyphagous species in a multi-crop environment in south Arkansas. Journal of Entomological Science 43(1): 1-12, 2008

Dynamics and seasonal abundance of stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in a cotton-soybean ecosystem. Journal of Economic Entomology 93(3): 697-706, 2000

Duration of feeding and superficial and in-depth damage to soybean seed by selected species of stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Neotropical Entomology 40(2): 197-203, 2011

Biology in different temperatures and thermal requirements of stink bugs of soybean. III. Piezodorus guildinii (West., 1837) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Cientifica 22(2): 177-186, 1994

Relationship between soybean maturity group and the phenology and abundance of stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): impact on yield and quality. Journal of Entomological Science 31(2): 199-208, 1996

Seasonal abundance, species composition, and population dynamics of stink bugs in production field of early and late soybean in South Arkansas. Journal of Economic Entomology 102(1): 229-236, 2009

Seasonal Abundance, Species Composition, and Population Dynamics of Stink Bugs in Production Fields of Early and Late Soybean in South Arkansas. Journal of Economic Entomology 102(1): 229-236, 2009

The fungistatic and fungicidal effects of volatiles from metathoracic glands of soybean-attacking stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on the entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 132: 77-85, 2015

Influence of planting date and row width on abundance of velvetbean caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and southern green stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in soybean. Journal of Economic Entomology 84(1): 311-316, 1991

Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) Feeding and Phenology on Early-Maturing Soybean in Minnesota. Journal of Economic Entomology 108(5): 2335-2343, 2015

Influence of cultivar planting date and row width on abundance of green cloverworms lepidoptera noctuidae and green stink bugs heteroptera pentatomidae in soybean. Journal of Entomological Science 23(4): 305-313, 1988

An improved trap for monitoring stink bugs (Heteroptera : Pentatomidae) in apple and peach orchards. Journal of Entomological Science 41(1): 9-21, 2006

Predation on stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in cotton and soybean agroecosystems. Plos one 14(3): E0214325, 2019

Egg Parasitoids of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae and Pentatomidae) on Soybean and Cowpea in Brazil. Florida Entomologist 98(3): 929-932, 2015