+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fruit, flies and filamentous fungi - experimental analysis of animal-microbe competition using Drosophila melanogaster and Aspergillus mould as a model system



Fruit, flies and filamentous fungi - experimental analysis of animal-microbe competition using Drosophila melanogaster and Aspergillus mould as a model system



Oikos 119(11): 1765-1775



In addition to their fundamental role in nutrient recycling, saprobiotic microorganisms may be considered as typical consumers of food-limited ephemeral resource patches. As such, they may be engaged in inter-specific competition with saprophagous animals feeding from the same resource. Bacteria and filamentous fungi are known to synthesise secondary metabolites, some of which are toxic and have been proposed to deter or harm animals. The microorganisms may, however, also be negatively affected if saprophagous animals do not avoid microbe-laden resources but feed in the presence of microbial competitors. We hypothesised that filamentous fungi compete with saprophagous insects, whereby secondary metabolites provide a chemical shield against the insect competitors. For testing this, we developed a new ecological model system representing a case of animal-microbe competition between saprobiotic organisms, comprising Drosophila melanogaster and species of the fungus Aspergillus (A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. flavus). Infestation of Drosophila breeding substrate with proliferating fungal colonies caused graduated larval mortality that strongly depended on mould species and colony age. Confrontation with conidiospores only, did not result in significant changes in larval survival, suggesting that insect death may not be ascribed to pathogenic effects. When confronted with colonies of transgenic fungi that lack the ability to express the global secondary metabolite regulator LaeA ( DELTA laeA), larval mortality was significantly reduced compared to the impact of the wild type strains. Yet, also in the. DELTA laeA strains, inter-specific variation in the influence on insect growth occurred. Competition with Drosophila larvae impaired fungal growth, however, wild type colonies of A. nidulans and A. flavus recovered more rapidly from insect competition than the corresponding. DELTA laeA mutants (not in A. fumigatus). Our findings provide genetic evidence that toxic secondary metabolites synthesised by saprotrophic fungi may serve as a means to combat insect competitors. Variation in the ability of LaeA to control expression of various secondary metabolite gene clusters might explain the observed species-specific variation in Drosophila-Aspergillus competition.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 037425015

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18088.x


Related references

Heterosis and tarsal response to sucrose in fruit fly drosophila melanogaster ii. study of flies raised without larval competition and comparison to other ones submitted to this competition. Biology of Behaviour 14(4): 241-254, 1989

Drosophila melanogaster as a model system for fruit flies of economic importance: the vitelline membrane protein 32E gene regulatory sequences. Fruit flies: biology and management Martin Aluja Pablo Liedo editors: 6, 1993

Recent Advances in the Use of Drosophila melanogaster as a Model to Study Immunopathogenesis of Medically Important Filamentous Fungi. International Journal of Microbiology 2012: 583792-583792, 2012

Heterosis and tarsal response to sucrose in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). II. study of flies reared in the absence of larval competition and comparison with those submitted to it. Biology of Behaviour 14(4): 241-245, 1989

Functions and analysis of the seminal fluid proteins of male Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies. Peptides 25(9): 1477-1490, 2004

In vivo high-resolution magic angle spinning proton NMR spectroscopy of Drosophila melanogaster flies as a model system to investigate mitochondrial dysfunction in Drosophila GST2 mutants. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 34(1): 327-333, 2014

A new acoustic signal of the fruit flies drosophila simulans and drosophila melanogaster. Bioacoustics 3(4): 247-254, 1991

Genetic variability of quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) natural populations: analysis of wild-living flies and of several laboratory generations. Heredity 80(3): 326-335, 1998

Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): a phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 387(10020): 760-769, 2016

The Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster as a Model System to Study Cholesterol Metabolism and Homeostasis. Cholesterol 2011: 176802-176802, 2011

Drosophila melanogaster as an animal model system for studying Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis. 2007

Respiratory allergy to laboratory fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 77(1 Pt 1): 108-113, 1986

Peculiarities of acoustic communication in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster. Sensornye Sistemy 14(1): 60-74, Jan -March, 2000

A new acoustic signal of the fruit-flies Drosophila simulans and D melanogaster. Bioacoustics, 34: 247-254, 1991

Sex differences in larval competition in drosophila melanogaster the testing of a competition model and its relevance to frequency dependent selection. American Naturalist 121(1): 67-93, 1983