EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

MHC genotyping of non-model organisms using next-generation sequencing: a new methodology to deal with artefacts and allelic dropout



MHC genotyping of non-model organisms using next-generation sequencing: a new methodology to deal with artefacts and allelic dropout



Bmc Genomics 14: 542-542



The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) is the most important genetic marker to study patterns of adaptive genetic variation determining pathogen resistance and associated life history decisions. It is used in many different research fields ranging from human medical, molecular evolutionary to functional biodiversity studies. Correct assessment of the individual allelic diversity pattern and the underlying structural sequence variation is the basic requirement to address the functional importance of MHC variability. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are likely to replace traditional genotyping methods to a great extent in the near future but first empirical studies strongly indicate the need for a rigorous quality control pipeline. Strict approaches for data validation and allele calling to distinguish true alleles from artefacts are required. We developed the analytical methodology and validated a data processing procedure which can be applied to any organism. It allows the separation of true alleles from artefacts and the evaluation of genotyping reliability, which in addition to artefacts considers for the first time the possibility of allelic dropout due to unbalanced amplification efficiencies across alleles. Finally, we developed a method to assess the confidence level per genotype a-posteriori, which helps to decide which alleles and individuals should be included in any further downstream analyses. The latter method could also be used for optimizing experiment designs in the future. Combining our workflow with the study of amplification efficiency offers the chance for researchers to evaluate enormous amounts of NGS-generated data in great detail, improving confidence over the downstream analyses and subsequent applications.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 037440027

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23937623

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-542



Related references

Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS): a novel, efficient and cost-effective genotyping method for cattle using next-generation sequencing. Plos One 8(5): E62137-E62137, 2013

GBStools: A Statistical Method for Estimating Allelic Dropout in Reduced Representation Sequencing Data. Plos Genetics 12(2): E1005631-E1005631, 2016

SNP discovery in non-model organisms using 454 next generation sequencing. Methods in Molecular Biology 888: 33-53, 2012

Minimum information for reporting next generation sequence genotyping (MIRING): Guidelines for reporting HLA and KIR genotyping via next generation sequencing. Human Immunology 76(12): 954-962, 2016

Forensic tri-allelic SNP genotyping using nanopore sequencing. Forensic Science International. Genetics 38: 204-210, 2018

Next-generation phylogeography: a targeted approach for multilocus sequencing of non-model organisms. Plos One 7(3): E34241-E34241, 2012

Next-generation biology: Sequencing and data analysis approaches for non-model organisms. Marine Genomics (): -, 2016

CAPRG: sequence assembling pipeline for next generation sequencing of non-model organisms. Plos One 7(2): E30370-E30370, 2012

Targeted capture sequencing in a large LQTS family reveals a new pathogenic mutation c.2038delG in KCNH2 initially missed due to allelic dropout. Acta Cardiologica 70(6): 747-749, 2016

Targeted capture sequencing in a large LQTS family reveals a new pathogenic mutation c.2038delG in KCNH2 initially missed due to allelic dropout. Acta Cardiologica 70(6): 747-749, 2015

Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping Using Next-Generation Sequencing: An Efficient Alternative to Sanger Sequencing. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 141(3): 323-324, 2017

A next-generation sequencing method for genotyping-by-sequencing of highly heterozygous autotetraploid potato. Plos One 8(5): E62355-E62355, 2013

Very high resolution single pass HLA genotyping using amplicon sequencing on the 454 next generation DNA sequencers: Comparison with Sanger sequencing. Human Immunology 76(12): 910-916, 2016

Caution regarding genotyping methodology for a tri-allelic polymorphism in the novel breast cancer susceptibility gene NQO2. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 118(3): 647-649, 2010

Extracting data from the muck: deriving biological insight from complex microbial communities and non-model organisms with next generation sequencing. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 28: 103-110, 2014