+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Recapture processes and biological inference in monitoring burrow-nesting seabirds



Recapture processes and biological inference in monitoring burrow-nesting seabirds



Journal of Ornithology 151(1): 133-146



Capture-mark-recapture methods are used widely for monitoring and diagnosis of bird populations as they permit robust estimates of population abundance and demographic parameters (e.g. survival) to be obtained from incomplete records of individual life histories. The statistical analysis of these data relies on the important assumption that individuals of the same local populations (i.e. colony) have the same parameters (the homogeneity assumption). We used data from six medium- to long-term monitoring schemes of local Mediterranean populations of the European Storm Petrel Hydrobates pelagicus to empirically show that the level of individual heterogeneity and the consequent bias in the parameter of interest depend on the recapture methodology, which has important consequences for the experimental design. We found that the recapture probability varied over time and among methodologies. The study design had a strong influence on the proportion of transients caught (i.e. individuals not recaptured after marking); however, the survival probability estimate for resident birds was fairly similar across the studies. The differences found in survival seem to depend on the biological variability between sites (e.g. predation pressure), and not on the recapture methods.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 037460555

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1007/s10336-009-0435-x


Related references

Use of radar for monitoring colonial burrow-nesting seabirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 70(2): 145-157, Spring, 1999

Habitat use and burrow densities of burrow-nesting seabirds on South East Island, Chatham Islands, New Zealand. Notornis 41(Suppl. ): 27-37, 1994

Can burrow-nesting seabirds be identified from their burrow dimensions?. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(3): 586-591, Fall, 2000

Use of Radar for Monitoring Colonial Burrow-Nesting Seabirds (Uso de Radares para Monitorear Aves Marinas Coloniales que Anidan en Huecos). Journal of Field Ornithology 70(2): 145-157, 1999

An artificial nest box for burrow-nesting seabirds. Emu 95(4): 290-294, 1995

Comparison of survey techniques for burrow-nesting seabirds. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes 151: 1-7, 1985

Improving the accuracy of population size estimates for burrow-nesting seabirds. Ibis 154(3): 0-0, 2012

An Experimental Study of the Use of Social Information by Prospecting Nocturnal Burrow-Nesting Seabirds. Condor 113(3): 572-580, 2011

Estimating colony and breeding population size for nocturnal burrow-nesting seabirds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 454: 83-90, 2012

Norway rats as predators of burrow-nesting seabirds: insights from stable isotope analyses. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1): 25, 1999

The use of knock-down tags to detect changes in occupancy among burrow-nesting seabirds: what is an adequate sample size?. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes 172: 1-4, 1988

Norway rats as predators of burrow-nesting seabirds: Insights from stable isotope analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1): 14-25, 1999

A Model Approach for Estimating Colony Size, Trends, and Habitat Associations of Burrow-Nesting Seabirds. Condor 115(2): 356-365, 2013

The effects of fire on burrow-nesting seabirds particularly short-tailed shearwaters (Puffinus tenuirostris) and their habitat in Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 133(1): 15-22, 1999

Distribution of introduced raccoons Procyon lotor on the Queen Charlotte Islands: Implications for burrow-nesting seabirds. Biological Conservation 88(1): 1-13, 1999