+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A genetic diversity comparison between captive individuals and wild individuals of Elliot's Pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti) using mitochondrial DNA



A genetic diversity comparison between captive individuals and wild individuals of Elliot's Pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti) using mitochondrial DNA



Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 6(5): 413-417



Maintaining genetic diversity is a major issue in conservation biology. In this study, we demonstrate the differences of genetic diversity levels between wild and captive individuals of Elliot's Pheasant Syrmaticus ellioti. Wild individuals showed a higher genetic diversity level than that of the captive individuals. Nucleotide diversity and haplotype diversity of wild individuals were 0.00628 and 0.993, while those of captive individuals were 0.00150 and 0.584 respectively. Only 3 haplotypes of mtDNA control region sequence were identified among 36 captive individuals, while 16 unique haplotypes were identified among the 17 wild individuals in this study. One captive haplotype was shared by a wild individual from Anhui Province. It is concluded that a low number of founders was the likely reason for the lower level genetic diversity of the captive group. Careful genetic management is suggested for captive populations, particularly of such an endangered species, to maintain genetic variability levels.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 037595708

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15822157

DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.b0413


Related references

Genetic structure among wild populations of Elliot's pheasant Syrmaticus ellioti in China from mitochondrial DNA analyses. Bird Conservation International 17(2): 177-185, 2007

Genetic analysis of microsatellite polymorphism in the Elliot's Pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti) in China. Dong Wu Xue Yan Jiu 31(5): 461-468, 2010

Metabolism and thermoregulation between Mrs Hume's Pheasant (Syrmaticus humiae) and Elliot's Pheasant (S. ellioti). Dong Wu Xue Yan Jiu 32(4): 396-402, 2011

Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in Elliot's pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti). Molecular Ecology Notes 6(4): 1160-1161, 2006

Seasonal variations in the energy budget of Elliot's pheasant (Syrmaticus ellioti) in cage. Dong Wu Xue Yan Jiu 34(E1): E19-E25, 2013

Notes on Elliot's pheasant Syrmaticus ellioti, streak-breasted scimitar babbler Pomatorhinus ruficollis and mountain scops owl Otus spilocephalus from Hunan, China. Forktail 2: 136-138, 2004

Elliot's Pheasant (Syrmatcus ellioti). Ornamental Pheasant Trust. Report of Council, 1961. Avicult: 1-9, 1962

White necked pheasant - Syrmaticus ellioti (Swinhoe). Chinese Journal of Zoology 242: 39-42, 1989

Comparison of energy metabolism between Syrmaticus ellioti and Syrmaticus humiae in captivity in winter. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 28 26(1): 145-147, 151, 2007

Long-term demographic and genetic effects of releasing captive-born individuals into the wild. Conservation Biology 33(2): 377-388, 2019

Comparison on behavior of Grus japonensis of semi-captive and wild individuals in incubating period. Chinese Journal of Zoology 43.6 (Dec 20): 62-67, 2008

Beyond the point of no return? A comparison of genetic diversity in captive and wild populations of two nearly extinct species of Goodeid fish reveals that one is inbred in the wild. Heredity 98(6): 360-367, 2007

Duck’s not dead Does restocking with captive bred individuals affect the genetic integrity of wild mallard Anas platyrhynchos population?. Biological Conservation 152(none), 2012

Comparison of the Nest-site Selection between Semi-captive and Wild Individuals of Grus japonensis in Zhalong Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Zoology 45.4 (Aug 20): 68-71, 2010

Analysis of genetic diversity of the mitochondrial DNA in the forensic medical expert identification of individuals. Sudebno-Meditsinskaia Ekspertiza 46(2): 20-25, 2003