EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Can bivalve suspension-feeders affect pelagic food web structure?






NATO Science Series IV Earth and Environmental Sciences, 47: 31-51

Can bivalve suspension-feeders affect pelagic food web structure?



Accession: 038040357



Related references

Porter, E.T.; Newell, R.I.E.; Sanford, L.P., 1996: Physical and biological scaling of benthic-pelagic coupling in coastal ecosystems The role of bivalve suspension feeders. Journal of Shellfish Research 15(2): 490-491

Langdon, CJ.; Newell, RIE., 1990: Utilization of detritus and bacteria as food sources by two bivalve suspension-feeders, the oyster Crassostrea virginica and the mussel Geukensia demissa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 583: 299-310

Sara, G.; Mazzola, A., 2004: The carrying capacity for Mediterranean bivalve suspension feeders: evidence from analysis of food availability and hydrodynamics and their integration into a local model. In order to assess the carrying capacity of two Mediterranean areas, the Incze et al. model and its modification were applied. Our measures were carried out in the Gulf of Gaeta (Central MED), where mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) are intensiv...

Troost, K.; Stamhuis, E.J.; van Duren, L.A.; Wolff, W.J., 2009: Feeding current characteristics of three morphologically different bivalve suspension feeders, Crassostrea gigas, Mytilus edulis and Cerastoderma edule, in relation to food competition. Introduced Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) have shown rapid expansion in the Oosterschelde estuary, while stocks of native bivalves declined slightly or remained stable. This indicates that they might have an advantage over native bivalve filt...

Zemlys, P.; Daunys, D., 2005: Modelling particle selection efficiency of bivalve suspension feeders. NATO Science Series IV Earth and Environmental Sciences, 47: 1-9

Andre, C.; Jonsson, P.R.; Lindegarth, M., 1993: Predation on settling bivalve larvae by benthic suspension feeders: The role of hydrodynamics and larval behaviour. Predation by the suspension-feeding infaunal bivalve Cerastoderma edule on settling C. edule larvae was studied in a flume boundary-layer flow. The density of settled larvae was reduced by 33% in an area of 5 cm-2 enclosing individual adults. Mean...

Wong, W.-Hing; Levinton, J., S., 2006: The trophic linkage between zooplankton and benthic suspension feeders: direct evidence from analyses of bivalve faecal pellets. Using radiotracer (14C) and microscopic observation, we demonstrated that mussels (Mytilus edulis and Perna viridis) could be predators of mesozooplankton (rotifer Brachionus plicatilis). At radio-labelled rotifer densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 i...

Lenz, J., 1977: On detritus as a food source for pelagic filter feeders. Data on the amount of organic detritus within the particle size fraction 1-150 .mu. are presented for the western Kiel Bight [West Germany]. Grouped into a mixed surface layer and a stratified lower layer in accordance with the main hydrographic f...

Loo L O.; Rosenberg R., 1989: Bivalve suspension feeding dynamics and benthic pelagic coupling in an eutrophicated marine bay. The open exposed Laholm Bay [Sweden] in the Kattegat is eutrophicated through riverine input, mainly of N. The benthic macrofauna down to 10 m depth (60 km2) is dominated by the suspension-feeding bivalves Cardium edule and Mya arenaria. To estima...

Dame, Richard F. ., 1993: Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on the Role of Bivalve Filter Feeders in Marine Ecosystem Processes, held at Renesse, The Netherlands, November 30 to December 4, 1992. NATO ASI Series Series G Ecological Sciences, 33: 1-579