An in-vitro and in-vivo comparison of the activity of beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations with imipenem and cephalosporins against Escherichia coli producing TEM-1 or TEM-2 beta-lactamase
Cherubin, C.E.; Eng, R.H.; Smith, S.M.; Tan, E.N.
Journal of Antimicrobial ChemoTherapy 28(1): 61-70
ISSN/ISBN: 0305-7453 PMID: 1769944 DOI: 10.1093/jac/28.1.61
Reference strains of Escherichia coli (ampicillin-susceptible and -resistant ATCC strains, and known TEM-1 and TEM-2 beta-lactamase producers) were tested in vitro and in the in-vivo mouse thigh infection model against four beta-lactamase inhibitor compounds (BICs: amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, and piperacillin/tazobactam), selected cephalosporins, and imipenem. The ATCC strains (ampicillin-susceptible and -resistant) were susceptible to the BICs in disc and MIC tests. Three or more logs of killing were observed at the NCCLS breakpoint concentrations. However, the TEM-1 and TEM-2 producers were resistant in disc tests to ampicillin/sulbactam and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, and showed intermediate susceptibility to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid. MICs were at or near the breakpoint, but bactericidal activity was only noted at the probable breakpoint concentration of piperacillin/tazobactam. Cefoxitin, cefotaxime, cefpirome and imipenem, but not cephalothin, showed greater bactericidal activity and lower MICs for the TEM-producing strains than the BICs. The viable count of the TEM-1 producer was not reduced in the mouse thigh model by ampicillin/sulbactam or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, but cefpirome and cefotaxime reduced the viable count by approximately three logs. There was a 50% mortality rate in mice receiving the two BICs. The ampicillin-susceptible ATCC strain of E. coli was killed to a similar degree by all agents tested. Overall, the BICs appeared inferior, in both in-vivo and in-vitro tests to selected cephalosporins and imipenem when tested against reference strains of E. coli producing TEM-1 or TEM-2 beta-lactamase. The large inoculum effect and poor bactericidal activity observed with the BICs suggest they could be less effective in certain clinical situations.