+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers

Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers

American Journal of Dentistry 2(2): 51-56

Glass ionomer cements have been shown to possess antimicrobial activity. Proposed mechanisms of action include acidity and fluoride. It was the purpose of this study to determine the antimicrobial effect of 11 glass ionomer cements, their individual powder and liquid components and one resin-bonded liner containing high fluoride ionomer glass against Streptococcus mutans #6715. The role of fluoride and pH in the antibacterial activity was also studied. Using agar diffusion assay methodology, the following results were obtained. All of the glass ionomer cements were inhibitory against S. mutans. The antibacterial cements and slurries that were tested for fluoride, released the ion in excess of reported minimum inhibitory values. The antimicrobial activity of the liquid components, that were tested for the effects of pH changes, was totally lost when the pH was adjusted to 5. The resin bonded liner was inactive against S. mutans and did not release inhibitory concentrations of fluoride. These results indicate that freshly-mixed glass ionomer cements are antimicrobial against S. mutans and that the mechanism of action is probably a function of both fluoride and pH although additional factors may be involved.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 039292355

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2604960

Related references

Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers roles of ph and fluoride. Journal of Dental Research 68(SPEC ISSUE): 347, 1989

Flexural properties of resin-modified "hybrid" glass-ionomers in comparison with conventional acid-base glass-ionomers. Dental Materials Journal 14(2): 109-119, 1995

Effects of glass composition and pretreatment on the reactivity of novel glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomers) dental cements. Clinical Materials 7(1): 15-21, 1991

Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 21(2): 55-69, 2003

Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. Journal of Dentistry 33(6): 459-467, 2005

In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Operative Dentistry 33(6): 696-701, 2008

Antibacterial and physical properties of resin modified glass-ionomers combined with chlorhexidine. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29(6): 553-558, 2002

Glass ionomers and discoloration: a comparative study of the effects of tea and coffee on three brands of glass ionomer dental cement. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa 44(8): 333-336, 1989

The effect of fluoride application on fluoride release and the antibacterial action of glass ionomers. Journal of Dental Research 72(9): 1310-1314, 1993

Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins. Operative Dentistry 21(6): 257-264, 1996

Effects of glass ionomers on recurrent caries. Operative Dentistry 14(1): 40-43, 1989

Manipulation effects on early fluoride release from glass ionomers. Journal of Dental Research 71(SPEC ISSUE MAR): 135, 1992

Effects of temperature on the fluoride release and recharging ability of glass ionomers. Operative Dentistry 32(2): 138-143, 2007

Kinetics of fluoride release from glass components of glass ionomers. Journal of Dentistry 37(7): 495-501, 2009

Manipulation effects on fluoride release from chemically-cured and resin-modified glass ionomers. American Journal of Dentistry 10(3): 120-122, 1997