+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Calculations of antibody-antigen interactions: microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of the free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603



Calculations of antibody-antigen interactions: microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of the free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603



Protein Engineering 5(3): 215-228



The study of antibody-antigen interactions should greatly benefit from the development of quantitative models for the evaluation of binding free energies in proteins. The present work addresses this challenge by considering the test case of the binding free energies of phosphorylcholine analogs to the murine myeloma protein McPC603. This includes the evaluation of the differential binding energy as well as the absolute binding energies and their corresponding electrostatic contributions. Four different approaches are examined: the Protein Dipoles Langevin Dipoles (PDLD) method, the semi-microscopic PDLD (PDLD/S) method, a free energy perturbation (FEP) method based on an adiabatic charging procedure and a linear response approximation that accelerates the FEP calculation. The PDLD electrostatic calculations are augmented by estimates of the relevant hydrophobic and steric contributions. The determination of the hydrophobic energy involves an approach which considers the modification of the effective surface area of the solute by local field effects. The steric contributions are analyzed in terms of the corresponding reorganization energies. This treatment, which considers the protein as a harmonic system, views the steric forces as the restoring forces for the electrostatic interactions. The FEP method is found to give unreliable results with regular cut-off radii and starts to give quantitative results only in very expensive treatment with very large cut-off radii. The PDLD and PDLD/S methods are much faster than the FEP approach and give reasonable results for both the relative and absolute binding energies. The speed and simplicity of the PDLD/S method make it an effective strategy for interactive docking studies and indeed such an option is incorporated in the program MOLARIS. A component analysis of the different energy contributions of the FEP treatment and a similar PDLD analysis indicate that electrostatic effects provide the largest contribution to the differential binding energy, while the hydrophobic and steric contributions are much smaller. This finding lends further support to the idea that electrostatic interactions play a major role in determining the antigen specificity of McPC603.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 039443680

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 1409541

DOI: 10.1093/protein/5.3.215


Related references

On the specificity of antibody/antigen interactions: phosphocholine binding to McPC603 and the correlation of three-dimensional structure and sequence data. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur. Immunologie 136c(2): 271-276, 1985

Comparison between antigen-antibody binding energies and interfacial free energies. Immunological Communications 6(4): 341-354, 1977

Quantitative calculations of antibody--antigen binding: steroid--DB3 binding energies by the linear interaction energy method. Journal of Organic Chemistry 66(9): 3021-3026, 2001

Binding free energies for nicotine analogs inhibiting cytochrome P450 2A6 by a combined use of molecular dynamics simulations and QM/MM-PBSA calculations. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 22(7): 2149-2156, 2014

Bacterial expression and characterization of antigen binding fragments of the antibody mcpc603. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Suppl. (13 Part A): 92, 1989

Microscopic modes and free energies of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK1) binding with celecoxib and other inhibitors. Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 110(51): 26365-26374, 2006

Microscopic Modes and Free Energies for Topoisomerase I-DNA Covalent Complex Binding with Non-campothecin Inhibitors by Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulations. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 132(8):, 2013

Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies LRA, LIE and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to proteins. Biophysical Journal 78(1 Part 2): 332A, 2000

Microscopic and macroscopic models for calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins. Biophysical Journal 47(2 Part 2): 20A, 1985

Relative energies of binding for antibody-carbohydrate-antigen complexes computed from free-energy simulations. Journal of the American Chemical Society 122(2): 331-338, 2000

Free energies of binding from large-scale first-principles quantum mechanical calculations: application to ligand hydration energies. Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 117(32): 9478-9485, 2013

Use of Crystal MD Simulations to Speed Up Evaluation of Binding Free Energies of Dimannose Deoxy Analogs With M4-P51g-Cyanovirin-N. Biophysical Journal 98(3): 39a-40a, 2010

Understanding the microscopic binding mechanism of hydroxylated and sulfated polybrominated diphenyl ethers with transthyretin by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations. Molecular Biosystems 13(4): 736-749, 2017

Electron microscopic study of the lymphocytes capable of binding antigen-antibody-complement complexes. Cellular Immunology 4(3): 279-288, 1972

Immunoelectron microscopic localization of antigen antibody binding sites in histoplasma capsulatum and candida albicans. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 86: 192, 1986