+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy



Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy



Circulation 73(1): 100-107



This study was undertaken to compare the accuracies of the two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) and Doppler pressure half-time methods for the noninvasive estimation of cardiac catheterization measurements of mitral valve area in patients with pure mitral stenosis both with and without a previous commissurotomy. Data were retrospectively obtained from 74 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization within a 30 month period for evaluation of mitral stenosis, and who had two-dimensional echocardiograms performed before catheterization. Six patients (8.1%) had technically inadequate 2DE images and their data were excluded from analysis. Two of these patients had undergone commissurotomy, while the remaining four had not. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic examinations were attempted in 45 patients and adequate measurements of pressure half-times were obtained in all patients studied. Mitral valve area by two-dimensional echocardiography was measured as the planimetered area along the inner border of the smallest mitral orifice visualized during short-axis scanning, while pressure half-time was calculated as the interval between the peak transmitral velocity and velocity/square root 2 as measured from the envelope of the Doppler spectral signal. Calculations from catheterization represented the minimal valve area at rest as derived from the Gorlin formula with the use of pressure gradients and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output. Thirty-seven of the patients had had a previous mitral commissurotomy a mean of 11.2 +/- 5.4 years before, while the remaining 37 patients were previously unoperated. Mean valve area as determined at catheterization for the total group of patients ranged from 0.37 to 2.30 cm2 (mean = 1.08 +/- 0.42 cm2).

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 039614390

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3510084

DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.73.1.100


Related references

Comparative value of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time techniques to quantify stenotic mitral valve area in patients with previous commissurotomy. European Heart Journal 15(ABSTR Suppl. ): 305, 1994

Comparison of accuracy of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis by real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography versus two-dimensional echocardiography versus Doppler pressure half-time. American Journal of Cardiology 95(12): 1496-1499, 2005

Comparative accuracy of 2 dimensional echocardiography vs. doppler recordings in assessing mitral valve area in post commissurotomy patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 5(2 Part 2): 484, 1985

Angle of incidence does not affect accuracy of mitral stenosis area calculation by pressure half-time: application to Doppler transesophageal echocardiography. American Heart Journal 127(6): 1562-1572, 1994

Does chronic mitral regurgitation influence Doppler pressure half-time-derived calculation of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis?. Acc Current Journal Review 14(2): 29-30, 2005

Does chronic mitral regurgitation influence Doppler pressure half-time-derived calculation of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis?. American Heart Journal 148(4): 703-709, 2004

Correlation of prevalence and severity of mitral regurgitation and mitral stenosis determined by Doppler echocardiography with physical signs of mitral regurgitation and mitral stenosis in 100 patients aged 62 to 100 years with mitral anular calcium. American Journal of Cardiology 60(14): 1189-1190, 1987

Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy vs open mitral commissurotomy: evaluation of results by color Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Journal of Cardiology 23(2): 185-192, 1993

Echocardiography in patients with mitral valve stenosis prior to and following commissurotomy. Polski Tygodnik Lekarski 32(21): 797-800, 1977

Is Doppler pressure half-time inaccurate in elderly patients with mitral stenosis?. European Heart Journal 16(ABSTR Suppl. ): 237, 1995

Calculation of Mitral Valve Area in Mitral Stenosis: Comparison of Continuity Equation and Pressure Half Time With Two-Dimensional Planimetry in Patients With and Without Associated Aortic or Mitral Regurgitation or Atrial Fibrillation. Acta Medica Iranica 55(11): 696-704, 2017

Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 77(1): 78-85, 1988

Comparison of the usefulness of Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis in patients < 65 and > or = 65 years of age. American Journal of Cardiology 78(12): 1390-1393, 1996

Comparison of hemodynamic pressure half-time method and Gorlin formula with Doppler and echocardiographic determinations of mitral valve area in patients with combined mitral stenosis and regurgitation. American Heart Journal 119(1): 121-129, 1990

Calculation of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis using the proximal isovelocity surface area method. Comparison with two-dimensional planimetry and Doppler pressure half time method. Japanese Heart Journal 38(6): 811-819, 1997