+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative analyses among interfaces of some ceramic materials and bone in sheep

Comparative analyses among interfaces of some ceramic materials and bone in sheep

Bulletin du Groupement International Pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie and Odontologie 33(2): 95-100

Aim of this work is the evaluation of "in situ" implants in an animal model to study the interfaces that some ceramic materials for dental bone defects develop with bone and to check which material is more osteoconductive. In a sheep's jaw, eight holes were drilled and filled with six ceramic materials in granular shape. Two bilateral holes were left empty as reference. The ceramic materials were: porous tricalcium phosphate (TCP), porous hydroxylapatite (HA) and four bioactive glasses. The glasses differ for doping agents that affect the velocity of biodegradation in the living body. Monthly radiographs were taken and the X-ray pictures analyzed by means of a Video Display Computer in order to quantify the optical density changes occurred in the holes. After 4 months implantation, the segments of the jaw containing the materials were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in methylmethacrylate and sectioned. The results obtained under the microradiograph, the SEM and the X-ray microprobe showed a good bone repair only with TCP granules. A great degradation was seen in HA granules and particularly in glasses. The degradation modified the structure and the composition of the glass granules, but it was not followed by a consequent bone deposition.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 039614560

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2083386

Related references

A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 26(11): 1419-1432, 1992

A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all-ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 62(4): 476-479, 1989

Atomic resolution STEM analysis of defects and interfaces in ceramic materials. Micron 36(3): 219-231, 2005

Compositions and microstructures of the primary ceramic materials in the Paleolithic Age through XRD, SEM, and TEM analyses. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 89(1): 316-319, 2006

IGF-I mRNA expression level of cell in the interfaces of bone and four kinds of substitutive materials for bone tissues by the technique in situ hybridization. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 15(2): 159-161, 1997

The in vitro viability and growth of fibroblasts cultured in the presence of different bone grafting materials (NanoBone((R)) and Straumann Bone Ceramic((R))). FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA 65(1): 37-42, 2006

Effect of adding bone marrow to ceramic graft materials with different interconnectivities in lumbar arthrodesis : quantification of bone formation. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 18(2): 321-330, 2013

FIB/SEM and SEM/EDS microstructural analysis of metal-ceramic and zirconia-ceramic interfaces. Bulletin du Groupement International Pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie and Odontologie 50(3): 1-10, 2012

Effect of bone sialoprotein coating of ceramic and synthetic polymer materials on in vitro osteogenic cell differentiation and in vivo bone formation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part a 92(4): 1461-1467, 2010

Investigation of osseointegration by histomorphometric analyses of fixture bone interfaces. Journal of Dental Research 66(SPEC ISSUE MAR): 186, 1987

Comparative analysis and clinical experience with osteoplastic materials materials based on non-demineralized bone collagen and artificial hydroxylapatite at the close of bone defects in ambulatory surgical dentistry. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk 2014(7-8): 112-120, 2014

Directly auto-transplanted mesenchymal stem cells induce bone formation in a ceramic bone substitute in an ectopic sheep model. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 15(6): 1364-1378, 2011

Bonding and structure of ceramic-ceramic interfaces. Physical Review Letters 111(6): 066103, 2013