+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction and Virapap/Viratype kits



Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction and Virapap/Viratype kits



American Journal of Clinical Pathology 94(5): 554-560



Cervical samples from 270 women referred by area physicians were analyzed for the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Southern hybridization. Samples from 154 patients were concurrently analyzed by a commercial filter hybridization technique (Virapap and Viratype Kits, Life Technologies, Bethesda Research Labs, Gaithersburg, MD). The sensitivity of the Southern blot procedure combined with PCR was significantly higher than that of the Virapap and Viratype methods. HPV was detected in 67% of women who had positive results for dysplasia by PCR and in 47% by the Virapap method. HPV types 16/18 were found more commonly than types 6/11 in every diagnostic category. More than one HPV type was detected in 12% of HPV-positive patients. The prevalence of HPV in cytologically negative or indefinite patients as measured by PCR was 22% and 40%; in contrast, by the Virapap method, these values were 7% and 10%. These results demonstrate that PCR combined with Southern hybridization provides a higher level of sensitivity than methods that use hybridization without amplification of HPV DNA and also show that the prevalence of HPV is highest in cytologically positive smears.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 039614711

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2173396

DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/94.5.554


Related references

Comparison of Virapap filter hybridization with polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot hybridization methods for detection of human papillomavirus in tonsillar and pharyngeal cancers. European Archives Of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 250(2): 115-119, 1993

Comparison of ViraPap, southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33(8): 2229, 1995

Diagnosis of human papillomaviruses in the lower genital tract using the ViraPap/ViraType detection kit. Ceska Gynekologie 60(2): 87-89, 1995

Comparative study of six kits of polymerase chain reaction assay with cell culture and ligase chain reaction assay in detection of C. trachomatis infection. Zhonghua Pifuke Zazhi 34(3): 181-183, 2001

Analysis of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Colorectal Disease 7(5): 492-495, 2005

Human papillomavirus typing with GP5+/6+ polymerase chain reaction reverse line blotting and with commercial type-specific PCR kits. Journal of Clinical Virology 36(2): 126-132, 2006

A comparative study of human papillomavirus hpv detection in clinical specimens by multiplex pcr viratype and southern blot. FASEB Journal 5(4): A883, 1991

Comparative evaluation of tree commercial diagnostic kits for detection of M. tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction. Klinicheskaia Laboratornaia Diagnostika 2001(1): 54-56, 2001

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction in human papillomavirus equivocal and dysplastic cervical biopsies. Human Pathology. 24(9): 1012-1016, 1993

Detection of Human Papillomavirus in Korean Breast Cancer Patients by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Meta-Analysis of Human Papillomavirus and Breast Cancer. Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 50(6): 442-450, 2016

Comparative quantitative analysis of 14 types of human papillomavirus by real-time polymerase chain reaction monitoring Invader reaction (Q-Invader assay). Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 66(1): 58-64, 2010

Human papillomavirus localization in cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma using in situ polymerase chain reaction: review of the literature of human papillomavirus detection in these carcinomas. Pathology International 56(6): 301-308, 2006

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in penile lesions histologically negative for condylomata. Analysis by in situ hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 14(9): 829-836, 1990