+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness



Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness



Radiology 118(1): 189-195



High-resolution radiography may be done using either optical or radiographic magnification. In the former technique, industrial Type M film was used without screens and the image was viewed with 4-10X optical magnification. In the latter technique, RP film was used with Detail screens and 4X geometric magnification together with a microfocus x-ray tube having a nominal focal spot size of 50 mum. The imaging properties of both techniques were evaluated by means of H & D curves, modulation transfer functions, and Wiener spectra. It was found that for thin objects such as the hand, optical magnification provides better bone images than radiographic magnification; whereas for thicker parts such as the knee, radiographic magnification is superior.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 039630148

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 1244657

DOI: 10.1148/118.1.189


Related references

Optical vs radiographic magnification for fine detail skeletal radiography. Investigative Radiology: 331, 1974

Optical versus radiographic magnification for fine-detail skeletal radiography. Investigative Radiology 10(2): 160-172, 1975

Effect of film graininess on image quality in fine detail skeletal radiography. Medical Physics (woodbury): 107, 1974

The effect of geometric unsharpness upon image quality in fine detail skeletal radiography. Radiology: 723-725, 1974

Effect of geometric unsharpness upon image quality in fine-detail skeletal radiography. Radiology 113(3): 723-725, 1974

Effect of film graininess and geometric unsharpness on image quality in fine-detail skeletal radiography. Investigative Radiology 10(1): 35-42, 1975

Improved optical magnification for fine-detail radiography. Radiology 108(3): 707-708, 1973

Comparison of non-screen techniques (medical vs. industrial film) for fine-detail skeletal radiography. Investigative Radiology 11(5): 486-500, 1976

A comparison of conventional mammographic magnification, ultra high magnification and industrial magnification radiography in the radiographic detection of microcalcifications within core biopsies of the breast. British Journal of Radiology 70(839): 1099-1103, 1998

A clinical evaluation of proposed panoramic surveys using fine detail imaging. Dental magnification radiography versus rotational panoramic radiography. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 12(2): 83-93, 1983

Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: Comparison with conventional radiography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 82(1): 94-100, 1996

Direct radiographic magnification for skeletal radiology. An assessment of image quality and clinical application. Radiology 123(1): 47-55, 1977

Effect of image quality on tissue thickness measurements obtained with spectral domain-optical coherence tomography. Optics Express 17(5): 4019-4036, 2009

Comparison of radiographic and optical magnification techniques for objects in arbitary orientations relative to the film plane. Radiology 118(2): 439-441, 1976

Effect on image quality due to focal-spot variation in magnification radiography. Investigative Radiology 6(1): 70-75, 1971