+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of cement bases on the stresses and deflections in composite restorations



Effects of cement bases on the stresses and deflections in composite restorations



Journal of Dental Research 55(1): 115-120



A model was used to investigate stresses and deflections in cement bases and in a composite restorative material induced in a posterior Class I restoration. Deflections in the composite were highest when it was supported by a base with a low modulus; however, the maximum tensile stress (12 MN/meter2) occurring in the composite restoration at the interface with the base was well below the maximum tensile strength of most composite materials (30 to 40 MN/ meter2). Tensile and shear stresses occurring in the cement bases were of sufficient magnitude to exceed the strength of the cement when a 1.5-mm layer of zinc phosphate cement (base consistency) was supported by a 0.5-mm layer of ZOE lining material. Lowest values of stress were observed when a 2-mm layer of a zinc polyacrylate base was used to support the composite restoration. An ideal situation would be to have a cement base with a modulus of elasticity equal to that of the composite material. Finally, the maximum stress and deflection values obtained here can be easily exceeded in a clinical situation when wider variations can be easily introduced, making the choice of a cement with the proper modulus even more critical.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 039961910

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 1060645

DOI: 10.1177/00220345760550010301


Related references

Effects of cement bases on the stresses in amalgam restorations. Journal of Dental Research 54(1): 10-15, 1975

Effects of Fiber-reinforced Composite Bases on Microleakage of Composite Restorations in Proximal Locations. Open Dentistry Journal 8(): 213-219, 2014

Adhesive restorations: comparative evaluation between the adhesion of the glass-ceramics to the composite cement and the adhesion of the ceromer to the composite cement. Minerva Stomatologica 54(10): 531-540, 2005

Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 16(2): 139-143, 2003

In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. "Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations". Clinical Oral Investigations 16(5): 1385-1393, 2015

Tulux cement. A new double-timed light-hardening composite cement for adhesive-retained restorations. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 99(4): 454-461, 1989

Two-year evaluation of class II resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite open sandwich and composite restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations 4(3): 133-139, 2000

Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations. Dental Update 25(7): 274-279, 1999

Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations?. Journal of Dental Research 82(12): 967-971, 2003

Cement bases under amalgam restorations: effect of thickness. Operative Dentistry 6(3): 82-89, 1981

A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 52(6): 368-376, 1994

Surface stresses induced by rapid temperature changes in composite restorations. Journal Of Dental Researchec. Issue: 285, 1983

Penetration of isotopes through liners and bases under silicate cement restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 65: 786-796, 1962

Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry 26(2): 165-171, 1998

Sensitivity of teeth with and without cement bases under amalgam restorations: a clinical study. Operative Dentistry 9(4): 130-135, 1984