+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

In vitro evaluation of iris chafe protection afforded by hydrophilic surface modification of polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses



In vitro evaluation of iris chafe protection afforded by hydrophilic surface modification of polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses



Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 14(5): 514-519



An in vitro iris chafe test was developed to evaluate possible differences in abrasive interaction of various intraocular lens (IOL) materials with the posterior surface of the iris. The materials that were compared in initial tests with rabbit irides were high molecular weight polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), the primary IOL material in current use, and surface-modified PMMA, which had a permanent, chemically bound, hydrophilic, polymer surface. Scanning electron microscopy, light microscopy, and examination of histological sections were used to assess tissue damage. A "window defect" type of abrasive damage was observed by light microscopy for PMMA lenses and is very similar in appearance to that seen for iris abrasion by human implants when viewed in vivo in slitlamp examinations. Results for both pigmented and albino rabbit irides indicate a reduction in abrasive insult to the external iris basement membrane and underlying pigment epithelium by the hydrophilic surface modification of PMMA. These results are consistent with our observation of a major reduction in corneal endothelium damage on contact with the hydrophilic surface-modified PMMA as compared with PMMA itself. This in vitro iris abrasion test, therefore, appears to be a useful technique for future evaluation of IOL surface properties.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 040390757

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3183932

DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(88)80008-7


Related references

A retrospective analysis of heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses versus regular polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 92(1): 41-50, 1996

Comparative evaluation of 2 models of intraocular lenses (the iris-clip-lenses and the extrapupillary iris-lenses). Oftalmologicheskii Zhurnal 33(4): 270-274, 1978

In vitro evaluation of inflammatory cell response after CF4 plasma surface modification of poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 19(3): 364-370, 1993

Effect of heparin surface modification of polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses on signs of postoperative inflammation after extracapsular cataract extraction one year results of a double masked multicenter study. Ophthalmology 99(8): 1248-1255, 1992

Fluorescence iridoangiography in assessing iris microcirculation with the implantation of intraocular lenses made of silicon and polymethylmethacrylate. Vestnik Oftalmologii 103(3): 18-21, 1987

Comparison of sulcus implantation of single-piece hydrophilic foldable acrylic and polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses in eyes with posterior capsule tear during phacoemulsification surgery. European Journal of Ophthalmology 17(4): 595-600, 2007

Comparison of complement activation by silicone intraocular lenses and polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses with polypropylene loops. Archives of Ophthalmology 105(7): 989-990, 1987

Influence of a new surface modification of intraocular lenses with fluoroalkylsilan on the adherence of endophthalmitis-causing bacteria in vitro. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 244(9): 1171-1177, 2006

Neutral red assay of the cytotoxicity of fluorocarbon-coated polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 48(6): 814-819, 1999

Evaluation of the quality of generic polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses marketed in India. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 29(2): 64-67, 2001

Comparison of the effect of polymethylmethacrylate and silicone intraocular lenses on rabbit corneal endothelium in vitro. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 13(4): 397-400, 1987

Evaluating and defining the sharpness of intraocular lenses: microedge structure of commercially available square-edged hydrophilic intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 35(3): 556-566, 2009

Intraocular optical quality of phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of angle-supported, iris-fixated, and posterior chamber lenses. American Journal of Ophthalmology 156(4): 789-799, 2013