+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Individual difference variables in close relationships: a contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework

Individual difference variables in close relationships: a contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 713-721

We examined and refined a contextual model of marriage (Bradbury & Fincham, 1987) in order to organize the associations between individual difference variables and satisfaction in close relationships. Seventy-eight spouses were administered instruments assessing marital satisfaction and individual differences in femininity, masculinity, dysfunctional relationship beliefs, and causal and responsibility attributions for marital difficulties. As predicted, higher levels of satisfaction were related to femininity and to partner's femininity, and lower levels of satisfaction were related to dysfunctional beliefs and less benign attributions. More important, two competing hypotheses relating to the contextual model were tested. A model in which the transitory, or proximal, context (e.g., responsibility attributions for specific relationship events) mediates the relation between the stable, or distal, context (e.g., general beliefs about relationships) and satisfaction was refuted. Support was obtained, however, for a model in which proximal and distal variables both account for unique variance in marital satisfaction. The usefulness of distinguishing between transitory and stable variables and the implications of the contextual model for organizing research on close relationships are discussed.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 040415940

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3367287

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.713

Related references

Educational Barriers of Rural Youth: Relation of Individual and Contextual Difference Variables. Journal of Career Assessment 20(1): 71-87, 2012

Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 8(4): 517-526, 1993

Attachment and Close Relationships: An Individual-Difference Perspective. Psychological Inquiry 5(1): 27-30, 1994

Strengthening Connectedness in Close Relationships: A Model for Applying Contextual Therapy. Family Process 2019:, 2019

Affect and Cognition in Close Relationships: Towards an Integrative Model. Cognition & Emotion 1(1): 59-87, 1987

The Effect of Method Variance on Relationships between the Work Ethic and Individual Difference Variables. Journal of Business and Psychology 14(1): 173-186, 1999

Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology 55(1): 1-18, 2008

Moderating effect of individual difference variables on the relationships between core job dimensions and valued outcomes. Journal of Applied Recreation Research 16(3): 179-199, 1991

Dispositional and contextual perspectives on coping: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Clinical Psychology 59(12): 1387-1403, 2003

Testosterone and human behavior: the role of individual and contextual variables. Current Opinion in Psychology 19: 149-153, 2018

An Investigation Of Individual And Contextual Factors Influencing Training Variables. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 33(2): 159-174, 2005

The Impact of Attributions in Marriage: An Individual Difference Analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 6(1): 69-85, 1989

Acculturation of Erasmus students: Using the multidimensional individual difference acculturation model framework. International Journal of Psychology 54(6): 739-749, 2019

Bias and accuracy in close relationships: an integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(4): 322-338, 2004

Associations between the practice of bullying and individual and contextual variables from the aggressors' perspective. Jornal de Pediatria 92(1): 32-39, 2016