+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laboratory assessment of three new monitors of blood glucose: Accu-Chek II, Glucometer II, and Glucoscan 2000



Laboratory assessment of three new monitors of blood glucose: Accu-Chek II, Glucometer II, and Glucoscan 2000



Clinical Chemistry 32(12): 2195-2200



We describe a laboratory assessment of three new monitors of blood glucose concentrations: the Boehringer "Accu-Chek II" (B), the Ames "Glucometer II" (A), and the Lifescan "Glucoscan 2000" (L). Inherent imprecision (CV) of each monitor was less than 2%. Maximum difference between individual monitors of the same type was less than or equal to 0.5 mmol/L. The volume of blood applied to the test strips is not critical, but duration of blood incubation or color development should be precise. Two types of test strips retained sufficient color 48 h after development to allow checking of the original measurement, and would be suitable as quality-control "spot" checks. Correlation coefficients for results for whole-blood glucose vs those for serum glucose (measured with the Beckman ASTRA-8) were: 0.992 (B), 0.967 (A), and 0.988 (L). Bias plots of these data showed positive bias for A (0.45 mmol/L) and L (0.17 mmol/L) in relation to serum-glucose measurements, but a negative bias of 0.32 mmol/L for B. Calibration solutions are not interchangeable. Although these versions of the monitors are probably not analytically superior to earlier models, they are easier to use.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 040545106

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3779982


Related references

Comparison of the Accu-Chek Aviva point-of-care glucometer with blood gas and laboratory methods of analysis of glucose measurement in equine emergency patients. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 22(5): 1189-1195, 2008

Comparative study of home blood glucose monitoring devices: Visidex, Chemstrip bG, Glucometer, and Accu-Chek bG. Diabetes Care 6(6): 529-532, 1983

A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 10(2): 102-110, 2008

Toxic levels of acetaminophen produce a major positive interference on Glucometer Elite and Accu-chek Advantage glucose meters. Clinical Chemistry 44(4): 893-894, 1998

Comparison of capillary Accu-Chek blood glucose values to laboratory values. American Journal of Perinatology 6(3): 334-336, 1989

Performance of GLUCOMETER ELITE, GLUCOMETER, ENCORE QA, and One Touch II blood glucose monitors. Clinical Chemistry 39(6): 1201, 1993

Comparison of arterial and capillary blood glucose with the use of the Accu-Chek III. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing 10(4): 27-30, 1995

Evaluation of the accu chek bg blood glucose meter for accuracy. Clinical Chemistry 31(6): 1013, 1985

Clinical evaluation of Accu-Chek EASY blood glucose meter. Clinical Chemistry 39(6): 1217, 1993

An evaluation of the Accu-Chek Advantage blood glucose monitoring system. Clinical Chemistry 41(S6 PART 2): S192, 1995

Capillary blood evaluation of the Accu-Chek advantage blood glucose monitoring system. Clinical Chemistry 42(6 PART 2): S149-S150, 1996

Self glucose monitoring: a comparison of the Glucometer, Glucoscan, and Hypocount B. Diabetes Care 6(3): 262-267, 1983

Multicentric evaluation of Accu-Chek Easy, a blood glucose monitoring system. Clinical Chemistry 41(S6 PART 2): S194, 1995

Evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Go and Medisense Optium blood glucose meters. Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry 353(1-2): 127-131, 2005

Evaluation of the integrated blood glucose monitoring system Accu-Chek Compact. Diabetes 50(Supplement 2): A422, June, 2001