+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) MR imaging of the liver: comparison with spin-echo imaging

Magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) MR imaging of the liver: comparison with spin-echo imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9(4): 469-476

We have implemented an MR technique that employs a rapid gradient echo sequence, preceded by magnetization preparation pulses to provide T1- and T2-weighted tissue contrast. With this technique, which can be identified as a member of a new family of pulse sequences, generically named Magnetization Prepared RApid Gradient Echo (MP-RAGE), very short repetition times are used, allowing acquisition times of less than one second and images virtually free of motion-induced artifacts during quiet respiration. Fifteen patients with known liver lesions (metastases, hemangiomas, and cysts) were examined using T1- and T2-weighted 2-dimensional MP-RAGE sequences, and the images were compared with conventional T1- and multi-echo T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequences. Signal difference-to-noise ratios (SD/Ns) of the lesions were calculated for all pulse sequences using corresponding axial images and were normalized for voxel volume. The mean normalized SD/Ns of the MP-RAGE sequences were generally comparable to those for the SE sequences. In addition, there were no noticeable respiratory artifacts on the MP-RAGE images whereas these were clearly present on the T2-weighted SE images and to a lesser degree on the T1-weighted SE images. It is concluded that the MP-RAGE technique could become an important method for evaluating the liver for focal disease.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 040623541

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 1779716

DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(91)90031-g

Related references

Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases. Acta Radiologica 49(10): 1167-1173, 2008

Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 15(1): 152-157, 1990

Optimization of white-matter-nulled magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 73(5): 1786-1794, 2015

Magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) magnetic resonance imaging of Morgagni's hernia. European Journal of Radiology 11(3): 196-199, 1990

A comparison of magnetization prepared 3D gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) sequences for imaging of intracranial lesions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 14(3): 329-335, 1996

Optimization of pulse sequence parameters for three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-rage) magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 21(6): 739-739, 1993

Comparison of fast turbo-spin-echo and gradient- and spin-echo sequences as well as echo planar imaging with conventional spin-echo sequences in MRI of focal liver lesions at 1.0 tesla. Rofo 165(2): 137-143, 1996

Visualization of the IXth to XIIth cranial nerves using 3-dimensional constructive interference in steady state, 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo and T2-weighted 2-dimensional turbo spin echo magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Journal of Neuroimaging 11(2): 160-164, 2001

Comparison of dual spin echo echo planar imaging (SE_EPI), turbo spin echo with fat suppression and conventional dual spin echo sequences for T(2)-weighted MR imaging of focal liver lesions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 18(6): 715-719, 2000

Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. European Radiology 28(4): 1709-1718, 2018

MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements. Abdominal Radiology 44(5): 1825-1833, 2019

Perfusion-sensitive MR imaging of gliomas: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging techniques. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 22(7): 1306-1315, 2001

Quantitative contrast ratio comparison between T1 (TSE at 1.5T, FLAIR at 3T), magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo and subtraction imaging at 1.5T and 3T. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 3(3): 141-146, 2013

T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: comparison of fat-suppressed GRASE with conventional spin echo, fat-suppressed turbo spin echo, and gradient echo at 1.0 T. Abdominal Imaging 26(2): 139-145, 2001

Spin-echo echo-planar MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma arising from chronic liver damage: Comparison with turbo spin-echo imaging. Computerized Medical Imaging & Graphics 24(1): 43-48, 2000