+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems



Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems



European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 19(1): 41-46



Two dual energy X-ray absorptiometric (DXA) instruments have recently become commercially available for local bone densitometry: the QDR-1000 (Hologic Inc.) and the DPX (Lunar Radiation Corp.). We report the precision, influence of femoral rotation, correlation and agreement of bone mineral measurements of the proximal femur by these two instruments. In vitro (femur phantom) short-term precision was 1.1%-3.5%, and the long-term precision was 1.2%-3.8%. In vivo (groups of 10 premenopausal and 10 post-menopausal women) short-term precision of duplicate measurements was 1.6%-4.7%, and long-term precision was 1.9%-5.5%. Overall, the precision for Ward's triangle was over 3% and that for the femoral neck and trochanter, 2%-3%. Rotation of a femur phantom produced a statistically significant change in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck. Within a clinically relevant range of femoral rotation (20 degrees inward rotation +/- 5 degrees) the coefficient of variation (CV%) increased by a mean factor of 1.1-1.4. Although the correlation (r less than 0.9) between BMD measurements of the proximal femur by the DPX and QDR-1000 in 30 postmenopausal women was high, there was lack of agreement between the two instruments. We found no statistically significant differences between the right and left femur in 30 postmenopausal women. A bilateral femur scan took a mean total time of about 22 min. We conclude that with the introduction of DXA instruments, the precision of bone mineral measurements of the proximal femur has improved. However, for comparability between commercially available DXA instruments, it might be advantageous if units were standardized.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 040654215

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 1547807

DOI: 10.1007/bf00178307


Related references

A long femur scan field does not alter proximal femur bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 14(3): 354-358, 2011

Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Skeletal Radiology 39(11): 1109-1116, 2010

Bone mineral density measurements of the proximal femur from routine contrast-enhanced MDCT data sets correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. European Radiology 23(2): 505-512, 2013

The evaluation of bone mineral density in the proximal femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Okayama Igakkai Zasshi 105(3-4): 331-339, 1993

The effect of hip rotation on bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi 20(2): 71-77, 2009

Premenopausal and postmenopausal changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 9(12): 1975-1980, 1994

Reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 30(12): 2101-2114, 2011

A reliable method for measuring proximal tibia and distal femur bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Medical Engineering and Physics 36(3): 387-390, 2014

Dual photon absorptiometric measurements of bone mineral density in active acromegaly. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 32(5 Suppl.): 1011, 1991

Dual photon absorptiometric measurements of bone mineral density increase with source life. Calcified Tissue International 41(5): 293-294, 1987

Pitfalls in the measurement of bone mineral density by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric method. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 26(10): 874-875, 2001

Bone mineral density in hemodialysis patients a dual energy x ray absorptiometric study. Blood Purification 9(1): 23-24, 1991

Measurements and evaluation of proximal femoral bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Acta Medica Okayama 66(1): 17-21, 2012

Comparison of differences between hip and lumbar bone mineral density in dual energy X-ray absorptiometric data. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 93(3): 191-194, 2013

Bone mineral density of vertebrae, proximal femur and os calcis in normal Greek subjects as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: Comparison with other populations. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 27(3): 219-227, 1997