+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Neodymium-YAG laser photocoagulation versus multipolar electrocoagulation for the treatment of severely bleeding ulcers: a randomized comparison



Neodymium-YAG laser photocoagulation versus multipolar electrocoagulation for the treatment of severely bleeding ulcers: a randomized comparison



Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 33(3): 199-202



A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of BICAP electrocoagulation and YAG laser photocoagulation was carried out in 100 patients presenting at endoscopy with peptic ulcer and a spurting or oozing vessel or a nonbleeding vessel. Fifty patients were enrolled in each treatment group. All lesions were pretreated with injection of epinephrine 1:10,000. Subsequently, 1-sec pulses of 80 watt YAG laser power were applied to the vessel or 1- to 2-sec pulses of electrocoagulation of 25 watt BICAP at a setting of 10. The 10 F BICAP probe was always used. Definitive hemostasis after one treatment amounted to 72% in both the laser and in the BICAP group. After two sessions the cumulative success rate was 88% in the laser group and 86% in the BICAP group. Emergency surgery and mortality were also comparable. One perforation occurred in each treatment group and both patients were operated upon without complications. It is concluded that both YAG laser and BICAP are highly and equally effective in the treatment of severe bleeding from peptic ulcers. This study stresses the importance of repeated treatment sessions in order to obtain optimal results.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 040780088

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3596184

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(87)71558-2


Related references

Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 99(5): 1303-1306, 1990

A randomized comparative study of laser photocoagulation heater probe and bipolar electrocoagulation in the treatment of actively bleeding ulcers. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 37(3): 299-304, 1991

Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. Gastroenterology 99(5): 1303-1306, 1990

Endoscopic injection therapy vs. multipolar electrocoagulation vs. laser vs. injection + octreotide vs. injection + omeprazole in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective randomized study. Hepato-Gastroenterology 47(35): 1332-1336, 2000

Comparison of endoscopic electrocoagulation and laser photocoagulation of bleeding canine gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology 82(5 Pt 1): 904-910, 1982

Endoscopic laser treatment. II. Comparison of the efficacy of high and low power photocoagulation in control of severely bleeding experimental ulcers in dogs. Gastroenterology 73(3): 481-486, 1977

A randomized comparison of multipolar electrocoagulation and injection sclerosis for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 37(3): 295-298, 1991

Injection of fibrin tissue adhesive versus laser photocoagulation in the treatment of high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a controlled randomized study. Endoscopy 28(9): 756-760, 1996

Injection of fibrin tissue adhesive versus laser photocoagulation in the treatment of high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a controlled randomized study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 46(2): 198-199, 1997

A prospective, randomized comparison of 10-Fr versus 7-Fr bipolar electrocoagulation catheter in combination with adrenaline injection in the endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. American Journal of Gastroenterology 98(10): 2192-2197, 2003

Randomized comparison of neodymium laser heater probe and no endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. Gastroenterology 98(5 Part 1): 1239-1244, 1990

Multipolar electrocoagulation mpec for the treatment of ulcers with non bleeding visible vessels vv a prospective controlled trial. Gastroenterology 94(5 Part 2): A246, 1988

Bipolar electrocoagulation versus Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding lesions. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 31(9): 906-910, 1986

Laser Photocoagulation Versus Ethanol Injection Therapy after Preinjection with Epinephrine in the Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcers. Digestive Endoscopy 5(3): 213-217, 1993

Endoscopic treatment by snare electrocoagulation prior to neodymium yag laser photocoagulation in 85 voluminous colorectal villous adenomas. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 34(5): 372-377, 1991