+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

OSHA's permissible exposure limits: regulatory compliance versus health risk



OSHA's permissible exposure limits: regulatory compliance versus health risk



Risk Analysis 9(4): 579-586



Workplace exposures to airborne chemicals are regulated in the U.S. by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) via the promulgation of permissible exposure limits (PELs). These limits, usually defined as eight-hour time-weighted average values, are enforced as concentrations never to be exceeded. In the case of chronic or delayed toxicants, the PEL is determined from epidemiological evidence and/or quantitative risk assessments based on long-term mean exposures or, equivalently, cumulative lifetime exposures. A statistical model was used to investigate the relation between the compliance strategy, the PEL as a limit never to be exceeded, and the health risk as measured by the probability that an individual's long-term mean exposure concentration is above the PEL. The model incorporates within-worker and between-worker variability in exposure, and assumes the relevant distributions to be log-normal. When data are inadequate to estimate the parameters of the full model, as it is in compliance inspections, it is argued that the probability of a random measurement being above the PEL must be regarded as a lower bound on the probability that a randomly selected worker's long-term mean exposure concentration will exceed the PEL. It is concluded that OSHA's compliance strategy is a reasonable, as well as a practical, means of limiting health risk for chronic or delayed toxicants.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 040841111

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2608949

DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01268.x


Related references

Updating OSHA's permissible exposure limits: putting politics aside. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 58(12): 845-849, 1998

What should hospitals do about vacated OSHA PELs (permissible exposure limits)?. Healthcare Hazardous Materials Management 8(4): 5-6, 1994

Compliance with the Osha Benzene Permissible Exposure Limit (Pel) at the Gasoline Vapor Pel. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 6(10): 881-884, 1991

OSHA--Final rule. Air contaminants--permissible exposure limits. (Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1910.1000). U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 50(4): A257-A293, 1989

Respiratory health of brickworkers in Cape Town, South Africa. Appropriate dust exposure indicators and permissible exposure limits. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 15(3): 198-202, 1989

Stringency of workplace air contaminant exposure limits: a case study of OSHA risk management. Risk Analysis 19(6): 1113-1125, 2000

Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: The bases for exposure limits in the United States. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 23(5): 683-694, 1993

OSHA's final rule on asbestos cuts permissible exposure in half. Health Facilities Management 8(1): 38-40, 1994

Voltammetric determination of Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu and Se in milk and dairy products collected from Iran: An emphasis on permissible limits and risk assessment of exposure to heavy metals. Food Chemistry 192: 1060-1067, 2016

OSHA compliance issues--exposure to tularemia. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 3(8): D74-D76, 2006

Permissible exposure limits. Chemical Health and Safety 7(4): 34-0, 2000

OSHA Compliance Issues: Tuberculosis Exposure and Follow-Up in a Hospital. Applied Occupational and Enviromental Hygiene 12(2): 94-96, 1997

Beryllium health effects, exposure limits and regulatory requirements. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 15(4): 5-12, 2008

OSHA Compliance Issues: Exposure to Radon Emissions from a Tunneling Project. Applied Occupational and Enviromental Hygiene 12(3): 159-162, 1997

OSHA Compliance Issues a Significant Workplace Exposure to Crystalline Silica. Applied Occupational and Enviromental Hygiene 12(8): 522-523, 1997