EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The assessment of bone formation and bone resorption in osteoporosis: a comparison between tetracycline-based iliac histomorphometry and whole body 85Sr kinetics



The assessment of bone formation and bone resorption in osteoporosis: a comparison between tetracycline-based iliac histomorphometry and whole body 85Sr kinetics



Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2(6): 479-489



Bone formation and resorption have been measured in patients with idiopathic osteoporosis by histomorphometry of 7.5-mm trephine biopsies and in the whole body by 85Sr radiotracer methodology and calcium balances. The studies were synchronized and most were preceded by double in vivo tetracycline labeling. Correlations between histological and kinetic bone formation indices were better when better when based on the extent of double tetracycline labels than on measurements of osteoid by visible light microscopy. Correction of the kinetic data for long-term exchange, using 5 months' serial whole body counting of retained 85Sr, improved the fit of the kinetic to the histological data. A statistical analysis of the measurement uncertainties showed that the residual scatter in the best correlations (between exchange-corrected bone formation rates and double-labeled osteoid surface indices) could be attributed to measurement imprecision alone. The exchange-corrected resorption rate correlated fairly well with iliac trabecular resorption surfaces, and using a volume referent rather than a surface referent for the histological index improved the statistical fit when patients with therapeutically accelerated bone turnover were included. A much better correlation was obtained by including osteoid volume acting as an independent predictor of bone resorption in a bivariate regression with a resorption surface index. The residual errors could then be accounted for by known measurement uncertainties. Whereas osteoid taking a double label closely predicted the kinetic rate of bone formation, further analysis suggested that osteoid that took no label or a single label was more closely related to bone resorption, presumably as a secondary result of the coupling of bone formation to bone resorption. The idea that continued bone loss in some patients is associated with defective osteoblastic bone formation is supported by the low rates found in some patients by both techniques. Heuristically these studies validate both in vivo tetracycline labeling for dynamic histomorphometry and corrections for long-term exchange in kinetic studies of bone formation, providing a quantitative framework for the design and analysis of future studies of bone remodeling in the osteoporoses.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 041578461

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3455632

DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020604



Related references

╬╝CT-based, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry allows 3D evaluation of the early responses of bone resorption and formation to PTH and alendronate combination therapy. Bone 73: 198-207, 2015

Difference in the fusion rate and bone formation between artificial bone and iliac autograft inside an inter-body fusion cage - A comparison between porous hydroxyapatite/type 1 collagen composite and autologous iliac bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 2018

Bone formation rate in older normal women: concurrent assessment with bone histomorphometry, calcium kinetics, and biochemical markers. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 67(4): 741-748, 1988

Cancellous bone remodeling in type I (postmenopausal) osteoporosis: quantitative assessment of rates of formation, resorption, and bone loss at tissue and cellular levels. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 5(4): 311-319, 1990

Comparison of histomorphometry and 85Sr uptake in induced heterotopic bone in rats. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63(3): 334-338, 1992

Histomorphometry of iliac bone biopsies in fluoride therapy for osteoporosis comparison of biopsies taken before treatment and at the time of a stress fracture. Journal of Bone & Mineral Research 5(SUPPL 1): S236, 1990

Intermethod variation in bone histomorphometry: comparison between manual and computerized methods applied to iliac bone biopsies. Bone 7(3): 235-235, 1986

Irreversible bone loss in osteomalacia. Comparison of radial photon absorptiometry with iliac bone histomorphometry during treatment. Journal of Clinical Investigation 76(6): 2403-2412, 1985

Effects of growth hormones on bone formation and resorption in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), as examined by histomorphometry of the pharyngeal bone. General and Comparative Endocrinology 86(1): 90-95, 1992

Evaluation of bone turnover in type I osteoporosis using biochemical markers specific for both bone formation and bone resorption. Osteoporosis International 3(5): 255-260, 1993

The applicability of biochemical markers of bone metabolism for predicting the risk of bone fractures and for the assessment of bone tissue resorption in the course of osteoporosis. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 27(2): 118-120, 2000

Sclerostin Antibody Reverses Bone Loss by Increasing Bone Formation and Decreasing Bone Resorption in a Rat Model of Male Osteoporosis. Endocrinology, 2017

The importance of assessing the rate of bone turnover and the balance between bone formation and bone resorption during daily teriparatide administration for osteoporosis: a pilot study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 34(2): 216-224, 2015

Effects of ethane 1 hydroxy 1 1 di phosphonate upon the kinetics of bone resorption and bone formation at the whole bone level in pre labeled chicks. Calcified Tissue International 35(4-5): 602-608, 1983

Bone marrow plays a role in bone metabolism: Histomorphometry of iliac bone in postmenopausal women. Calcified Tissue International 51(5): 348-351, 1992