+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

CT angiography of the common carotid artery bifurcation: comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography



CT angiography of the common carotid artery bifurcation: comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography



Neuroradiology 36(8): 602-604



We prospectively compared CT angiography (CTA) of the common carotid artery bifurcation using two different techniques with conventional angiography in patients with suspected stenoses of the internal carotid arteries in 20 symptomatic patients. Ten patients (Group 1) received 60 cc of contrast (medium 2 cc/sec) and CTA was acquired using 5 mm slices, reconstructed at 3 mm slice thickness. Ten patients (Group 2) received 90 cc of contrast (medium 3 cc/sec) and CTA was acquired using 3 mm slices reconstructed at 1 mm slice thickness. All CTA studies were postprocessed using maximum intensity projection algorithm. Stenoses were graded prospectively from CT angiograms and compared with selective conventional catheter angiograms. In Group 1, CTA overestimated the degree of narrowing in 9 of 10 stenoses proven by conventional angiograms. We interpreted 2 nearly occluded internal carotid arteries, 2 with moderate and marked stenoses, and 2 with no narrowings, but fibromuscular dysplasia on conventional angiograms as occluded on CTA, and 3 vessels as showing marked stenoses, not confirmed by angiography. CTA clearly depicted 1 mild stenosis, 4 normal bifurcations, and 6 occluded internal carotid arteries. In Group 2, CTA overestimated two stenoses; a correct diagnosis was made in 7 normal bifurcations, 3 mild, 2 moderate and 2 severe stenoses, 2 near occlusions, and 2 occlusions. Ulcerations were missed by CTA regardless of the technique utilized.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 042429496

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7862273

DOI: 10.1007/bf00600417


Related references

Value of the CT angiography in the diagnosis of common carotid artery bifurcation disease: CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography and color flow Doppler. European Journal of Radiology 39(3): 155-162, 2001

Diagnosis of disease of the common carotid artery bifurcation: CT angiography vs catheter angiography. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 161(2): 395-398, 1993

Common carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 168(2): 361-365, 1997

Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 163(3): 517-523, 1994

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 23(2): 213-219, 2002

Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 186(2): 339-344, 1993

Subtracted 3D CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 27(6): 1332-1337, 2006

Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 35(12): 2776-2781, 2004

Digital video subtraction angiography and duplex scanning in assessment of carotid artery disease: comparison with conventional angiography. Surgery 94(5): 821-825, 1983

Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography. Surgical Neurology 51(3): 300-309, 1999

Carotid bifurcation imaging: magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional angiography and Doppler ultrasound. European Journal of Vascular Surgery 7(3): 245-251, 1993

Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 236(1): 204-213, 2005

Comparison of auscultation, continuous wave Doppler imaging, intravenous digital subtraction angiography and conventional angiography in diagnosis of carotid artery disease. Angiology 38(11): 799-806, 1987

Angiography of the carotid and intracranial arteries. A comparison between intravenous digital subtraction angiography and conventional angiography. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 106(25): 2058-60, 2082, 1986

MR angiography of carotid artery aneurysms in a porcine model at 3 Tesla: comparison of two different macrocyclic gadolinium chelates and of dynamic and conventional techniques. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 36(5): 1203-1212, 2013