+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative costs of the various strategies of urinary stone disease management



Comparative costs of the various strategies of urinary stone disease management



Urology 46(3 Suppl A): 15-22



New technology is a major determinant of total healthcare costs. The assessment of alternative technologies from a cost-effectiveness perspective is important, although other considerations may finally determine which technology is used. The alternatives of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of renal stone disease were compared by studying 1000 cases of ESWL and 133 cases of PCNL using a noncontemporaneous cohort study with PCNL representing the earlier cohort. The effectiveness, defined by success and stone-free rates, was higher with PCNL than with ESWL (96% success vs. 70%); PCNL was also accompanied by a lower burden of additional therapy, whereas ESWL had a higher retreatment rate. From the perspective of a third-party payer, total costs per case of ESWL ($2,746) were lower than those of PCNL ($4,087), but the figure varies with the annual volume. These represent the costs for complete treatment of a patient, including the costs of alternative technology such as PCNL or ureteroscopy that may ultimately be necessary in a patient initially managed by ESWL. The cost for a single ESWL treatment was $2,226 (at a volume of 1000 cases per year), but this increased to $2,746 when costs of retreatment and alternative treatment were prorated to each patient treated. The relative contribution of capital costs to the total cost of ESWL was always less than total professional fees and was only 12% at a volume of 2000 cases/year. Therefore ESWL is less expensive but it is also less effective in rendering patients stone-free.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 042608065

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7653018

DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80245-3


Related references

Metabolic evaluation and medical management of upper urinary tract stone disease. Guidelines from the Scandinavian Cooperative Group for Urinary Stones. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 33(6): 372-381, 1999

Urinary stone disease - assessment and management. Australian Family Physician 40(10): 772-775, 2011

Integrated management of urinary stone disease. Western Journal of Medicine 147(2): 188-189, 1987

Medical management of urinary stone disease. Expert Opinion on PharmacoTherapy 8(8): 1117-1125, 2007

Etiology and medical management of urinary stone disease. Le Journal Medical Libanais. Lebanese Medical Journal 52(4): 210-212, 2006

Laparoscopy in the management of stone disease of urinary tract. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery 1(4): 173-180, 2005

Present concepts and strategies of disease management in pome and stone fruits. International Journal of Tropical Plant Diseases 17(1/2): 69-80, 1999

Recent management of urinary stone disease in a pediatric population. World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics 3(1): 1-5, 2014

Use of traditional Chinese medicine in the management of urinary stone disease. International Braz J Urol 35(4): 396-405, 2010

Total endoscopic management of complicated urinary stone disease. Saudi Medical Journal 24(2): 226-227, 2003

Gout, stone composition and urinary stone risk: a matched case comparative study. Journal of Urology 189(4): 1334-1339, 2013

Impact of socioeconomic status in etiology and management of urinary stone disease. Urologia Internationalis 70(4): 255-261, 2003

Therapeutic management of upper urinary tract stone disease in 172 subjects. Urology 33(4): 277-281, 1989

Effectiveness of a unani therapy (sangesarmahi) in management of urinary stone disease. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 31(3): 260-264, 1993

Comparative analyses of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery in pediatric urinary stone disease. Pediatric Surgery International 28(10): 1025-1029, 2012