+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of handwashing agent, handwashing frequency, and clinical area on hand flora



Effects of handwashing agent, handwashing frequency, and clinical area on hand flora



American Journal of Infection Control 12(2): 76-82



Six hundred twenty-two isolates from 554 samples taken from hands of 103 hospital personnel and 50 controls were obtained over a mean period of 35 days. Eighty-five were obtained immediately before and after handwashing (HW), the remainder after HW only. The relationship of HW agent used, clinical area and job, and frequency of HW to rates of bacterial colonization and numbers and types of organisms isolated, particularly gram-negative bacteria, were evaluated. The HW agent used ( nonantiseptic , hexachlorophene-based, chlorhexidine-based, or iodophor) was significantly correlated with the number of isolates obtained from each sample. Control subjects, all of whom used nonantiseptic soaps, had 1.42 mean isolates per sample; hospital personnel who used nonantiseptic soap had a mean of 1.00 isolates per sample. Other means were 1.25, hexachlorophene; 1.43, iodophor; 0.79, chlorhexidine; and 0.67 for those who used several different antiseptics, p less than 0.0001. The agent was also correlated with the type of organisms isolated (p = 0.002), but not with the counts of colony-forming units (CFU). Frequency of HW was significantly correlated with CFU counts before (p = 0.03) and after (p = 0.001) HW. In general, numbers decreased with increasing HW frequency, but at the higher HW frequencies there was a slight rise. There were significant differences in numbers of isolates per sample according to clinical area, with personnel working in obstetrics and nonpatient areas having the greatest number and those working on neonatal and medical-surgical units having the least (p less than 0.0001).

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 042955281

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 6563870

DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(84)90020-8


Related references

Influence of two handwashing frequencies on reduction in colonizing flora with three handwashing products used by health care personnel. American Journal of Infection Control 17(2): 83-92, 1989

Handwashing with soap and national handwashing projects in Korea: focus on the National Handwashing Survey, 2006-2014. Epidemiology and Health 37: E2015039, 2016

Alcohol-based handwashing agent improves hand washing. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 21(9): 617-618, 2000

Evaluation of handwashing behaviors and analysis of hand flora of intensive care unit nurses. Asian Nursing Research 5(2): 99-107, 2011

Is handwashing teachable?: failure to improve handwashing behavior in an urban emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 3(4): 360-365, 1996

Community Handwashing Guide: Utilizing Available Resources to Initiate a Handwashing Intervention. World Medical & Health Policy 6(1): 39-50, 2014

Provision versus promotion to develop a handwashing station: the effect on desired handwashing behavior. Bmc Public Health 17(1): 390, 2017

Handwashing practices and resistance and density of bacterial hand flora on two pediatric units in Lima, Peru. American Journal of Infection Control 20(2): 65-72, 1992

Handwashing, but how? Microbial effectiveness of existing handwashing practices in high-density suburbs of Harare, Zimbabwe. American Journal of Infection Control 45(3): 228-233, 2016

Study of an alcohol-based handwashing system on handwashing practice in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Pediatric Research 51(4 Part 2): 407A-408A, 2002

No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance?. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 18(3): 205-208, 1997

Handwashing machines, handwashing compliance, and potential for cross-contamination. American Journal Of Infection Control. 22(4): 228-230, 1994

Effectiveness of handwashing with electrolyzed water and its comparison with several types of handwashing methods against bacteria on hands after nursing procedures. Biocontrol Science 7(3): 155-162, 2002

Sustained improvements in handwashing indicators more than 5 years after a cluster-randomised, community-based trial of handwashing promotion in Karachi, Pakistan. Tropical Medicine and International Health 18(3): 259-267, 2013

Importance of handwashing agents used for handwashing practices. Professional Sanitation Management 17(2): 27-28, 1985