+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors

Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors

Gynecologic Oncology 149(3): 470-475

Label="OBJECTIVE">Endometrial cancer survivors are the least physically active of all cancer survivor groups and exhibit up to 70% obesity. While studies suggest lifestyle interventions result in improved health outcomes, recruitment and availability of these programs are limited. The purpose was to evaluate the acceptability and validity of the Fitbit Alta™ physical activity monitor (Fitbit) for socioculturally diverse endometrial cancer survivors.Label="METHODS">Thirty endometrial cancer survivors were given wrist-worn Fitbits to wear for 30 days. Participants then returned the Fitbits, completed the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ), Technology Acceptance Questionnaire, and answered qualitative prompts. Correlations between daily Fitbit step counts, demographic factors, body mass index (BMI), and GLTEQ Index, were analyzed using Stata 13.0. Concordance Correlation Coefficient using U statistics was used to examine convergent validity.Label="RESULTS">Twenty-five participants completed the study. Mean age was 62 ± 9 years. Mean BMI was 32 ± 9 kg·m-2. Self-identified race/ethnicity was 36% Hispanic, 36% non-Hispanic white, 16% non-Hispanic black and 12% Asian. Participants wore the Fitbits a median of 93% of possible days. Median daily Fitbit step count was 5325 (IQR: 3761-8753). Mean Technology Acceptance score was 2.8 ± 0.5 out of 4.0. Younger (<65 years) and employed participants were more likely to achieve at least 6000 daily steps (p < 0.05). There was no correlation (CCC = 0.00, p = 0.99) between step count and GLTEQ Index. Most free responses reflected positive experiences.Label="CONCLUSIONS">The Fitbits were well accepted in this sample. Self-reported physical activity was not associated with steps recorded. The physical activity data indicate an insufficiently active population.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 043572908

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29692337

DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.560

Related references

Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel technology-based intervention to support physical activity in cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer 25(4): 1291-1300, 2017

Acceptability of Fitbit for physical activity tracking within clinical care among men with prostate cancer. AMIA .. Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2016: 1050-1059, 2016

Feasibility of a physical activity intervention for obese, socioculturally diverse endometrial cancer survivors. Gynecologic Oncology 142(2): 304-310, 2016

Acceptability and satisfaction of project MOVE: A pragmatic feasibility trial aimed at increasing physical activity in female breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 27(4): 1251-1256, 2018

The feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week social cognitive theory-based physical activity intervention for obese, ethnically diverse endometrial cancer survivors. Gynecologic Oncology 137: 155-156, 2015

Study protocol for "Moving Bright, Eating Smart"- A phase 2 clinical trial on the acceptability and feasibility of a diet and physical activity intervention to prevent recurrence in colorectal cancer survivors. Bmc Public Health 13: 487, 2013

A Fitbit and Facebook mHealth intervention for promoting physical activity among adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors: A pilot study. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 64(12):, 2017

Get Healthy after Breast Cancer - examining the feasibility, acceptability and outcomes of referring breast cancer survivors to a general population telephone-delivered program targeting physical activity, healthy diet and weight loss. Supportive Care in Cancer 25(6): 1953-1962, 2017

Antecedents and mediators of physical activity in endometrial cancer survivors: Increasing physical activity through steps to health. Health Psychology 34(10): 1022-1032, 2015

Physical activity and obesity in endometrial cancer survivors: associations with pain, fatigue, and physical functioning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200(3): 288.E1-8, 2009

Assessing the Influence of a Fitbit Physical Activity Monitor on the Exercise Practices of Emergency Medicine Residents: A Pilot Study. Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth 5(1): E2, 2017

Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Gastrointestinal Cancer Survivors: Need and Acceptability of Digital Health Interventions. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2018:, 2018

Cancer-related fatigue and physical activity among premenopausal cervical and endometrial cancer survivors in Japan. Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences 62(3): 57-68, 2015

Telehealth applied to physical activity during cancer treatment: a feasibility, acceptability, and randomized pilot study. Supportive Care in Cancer 26(10): 3413-3421, 2018

Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a physical activity counseling intervention using Fitbit in people with knee osteoarthritis: the TRACK-OA study protocol. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 1: 30, 2015