+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale



Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale



Pain 159(8): 1508-1517



Appropriate pain measurement relies on the use of valid, reliable tools. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the psychometric properties of 3 self-reported pain scales commonly used in the pediatric emergency department (ED). The inclusion criteria were children aged 6 to 17 years presenting to the ED with a musculoskeletal injury and self-reported pain scores ≥30 mm on the mechanical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Self-reported pain intensity was assessed using the mechanical VAS, Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), and Colour Analogue Scale (CAS). Convergent validity was assessed by Pearson correlations and the Bland-Altman method; responsiveness to change was assessed using paired sample t tests and standardized mean responses; and reliability was estimated using relative and absolute indices. A total of 456 participants were included, with a mean age of 11.9 years ± 2.7 and a majority were boys (252/456, 55.3%). Correlations between each pair of scales were 0.78 (VAS/FPS-R), 0.92 (VAS/CAS), and 0.79 (CAS/FPS-R). Limits of agreement (95% confidence interval) were -3.77 to 2.33 (VAS/FPS-R), -1.74 to 1.75 (VAS/CAS), and -2.21 to 3.62 (CAS/FPS-R). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated by significant differences in mean pain scores among the scales (P < 0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of repeatability estimates suggested acceptable reliability for the 3 scales at, respectively, 0.79 and ±2.29 (VAS), 0.82 and ±2.07 (CAS), and 0.76 and ±2.82 (FPS-R). The scales demonstrated good psychometric properties for children with acute pain in the ED. The VAS and CAS showed a strong convergent validity, whereas FPS-R was not in agreement with the other scales.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 044203834

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29608509

DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001236


Related references

Comparison of visual analogue scale and faces rating scale in measuring acute postoperative pain. Archives of Iranian Medicine 12(1): 73-75, 2009

The end of the line? The Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Numerical Rating Scale as pain assessment tools in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal 27(5): 372-375, 2010

Measurement Properties of Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Pain Severity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Journal of Pain 20(3): 245-263, 2019

Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients. Pain Physician 18(2): E195-E200, 2015

Postoperative self-report of pain in children: interscale agreement, response to analgesic, and preference for a faces scale and a visual analogue scale. Pain Research and Management 15(3): 163-168, 2010

Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emergency Medicine 15(5-6): 441-446, 2004

Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1(4): 379-384, 1975

Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emergency Medicine Australasia 15(5-6): 441-446, 2003

Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the Catalan version of the faces pain scale--revised. Pain 111(1-2): 59-64, 2004

The visual analogue scale for anxiety revised psychometric properties. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 6(3): 223-239, 1992

Evaluation of the Revised Faces Pain Scale, Verbal Descriptor Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Iowa Pain Thermometer in older minority adults. Pain Management Nursing 7(3): 117-125, 2006

Pediatric pain measurement using a visual analogue scale: a comparison of two teaching methods. Clinical Pediatrics 42(3): 227-234, 2003

Defining mild, moderate, and severe pain by using the color analogue scale with children presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 13(3): 341-344, 2006

Pain measurement in pediatric emergency care: a review of the faces pain scale-revised. Pediatric Emergency Care 21(2): 90-93, 2005

Defining No Pain, Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain Based on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and Color Analog Scale in Children With Acute Pain. Pediatric Emergency Care 34(8): 537-544, 2018