+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy

A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 25(1): 122

Emergency medical dispatching should be as accurate as possible in order to ensure patient safety and optimize the use of ambulance resources. This study aimed to compare the accuracy, measured as priority level, between two Swedish dispatch protocols - the three-graded priority protocol Medical Index and a newly developed prototype, the four-graded priority protocol, RETTS-A. A simulation study was carried out at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) in Stockholm, Sweden, between October and March 2016. Fifty-three voluntary telecommunicators working at SOS Alarm were recruited nationally. Each telecommunicator handled 26 emergency medical calls, simulated by experienced standard patients. Manuscripts for the scenarios were based on recorded real-life calls, representing the six most common complaints. A cross-over design with 13 + 13 calls was used. Priority level and medical condition for each scenario was set through expert consensus and used as gold standard in the study. A total of 1293 calls were included in the analysis. For priority level, n = 349 (54.0%) of the calls were assessed correctly with Medical Index and n = 309 (48.0%) with RETTS-A (p = 0.012). Sensitivity for the highest priority level was 82.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6-87.3%) in the Medical Index and 54.0% (44.3-63.4%) in RETTS-A. Overtriage was 37.9% (34.2-41.7%) in the Medical Index and 28.6% (25.2-32.2%) in RETTS-A. The corresponding proportion of undertriage was 6.3% (4.7-8.5%) and 23.4% (20.3-26.9%) respectively. In this simulation study we demonstrate that Medical Index had a higher accuracy for priority level and less undertriage than the new prototype RETTS-A. The overall accuracy of both protocols is to be considered as low. Overtriage challenges resource utilization while undertriage threatens patient safety. The results suggest that in order to improve patient safety both protocols need revisions in order to guarantee safe emergency medical dispatching.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 044203974

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29284542

DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0464-z

Related references

Compliance with and use of up-to-date National Academies of Medical Dispatch Medical Priority Dispatch System protocols in dispatch practice and research studies must be a requirement. Stroke 40(10): E591-2; Author Reply E593, 2009

Accuracy of emergency medical dispatchers' subjective ability to identify when higher dispatch levels are warranted over a Medical Priority Dispatch System automated protocol's recommended coding based on paramedic outcome data. Emergency Medicine Journal 24(8): 560-563, 2007

The accuracy of emergency medical dispatcher-assisted layperson-caller pulse check using the medical priority dispatch system protocol. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 27(3): 252-259, 2012

Predictive ability of emergency medical priority dispatch system protocols should be assessed at the atomic level of the determinant code. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 25(4): 318-319, 2010

Profile of emergency medical dispatch calls for breathing problems within the medical priority dispatch system protocol. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 23(5): 412-419, 2009

The use of emergency medical dispatch protocols to reduce the number of inappropriate scene responses made by advanced life support personnel. Prehospital Emergency Care 4(2): 186-189, 2000

Role of Emergency Medical Dispatch in Responding to Acute Stroke: Expanding Beyond High Priority Dispatch?. Prehospital Emergency Care 22(1): 99-100, 2017

Physician medical direction of emergency medical services dispatch programs. American College of Emergency Physicians. Annals of Emergency Medicine 33(3): 372-372, 1999

Paediatric medical emergency calls to a Danish Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre: a retrospective, observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 26(1): 2, 2018

Comparison of Medical Priority Dispatch (MPD) and Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) relating to cardiac arrest calls. Resuscitation 85(5): 612-616, 2014

The Norwegian Medical Dispatch System and the Norwegian Index for Emergency Medical Dispatch. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 15(4): 342-346, 2012

Protocols vs. guidelines. Choosing a medical-dispatch program. Emergency Medical Services 23(10): 52-60, 1994

"Can you send an ambulance please?": a comparison of callers' requests for emergency medical dispatch in non-stroke and stroke calls. Emergency Medicine Journal 31(E1): E25-E28, 2015

Emergency medical dispatch codes association with emergency department outcomes. Prehospital Emergency Care 17(1): 29-37, 2013

Recommended guidelines for reporting on emergency medical dispatch when conducting research in emergency medicine: the Utstein style. Resuscitation 79(2): 193-197, 2008