+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared



Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared



American Review of Respiratory Disease 123(2): 195-199



Comparison of methods of aerosol generation and inhalation is required to improve standardization of inhalation provocation tests. We compared two widely used methods in 10 asthmatics, by measuring the dose and distribution of radiolabeled aerosol deposited in the throat and lung, and the provocation concentration of inhaled histamine required to reduce the FEV1 by 20% (PC20). In one method, aerosol was generated by a DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer attached to a dosimeter, and was inhaled by 5 inspiratory capacity breaths. The measurements with each method were repeated once to determine the reproducibility of results. Both methods deposited the same dose in the lung, but the distribution of the dose was different; the dosimeter method deposited more aerosol in the throat and central airways. The PC20 obtained with each method was the same. The reproducibility of all measurements in the same subject was similar. The lung dose deposited by each method in different subjects varied to the same degree. The results indicated that the bronchial response to inhaled histamine can be measured as reliably using a nebulizer and tidal breathing as by a more complex dose-metering device. They also suggested that, when the methods are regulated as described, the PC20 will have the same clinical significance.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 044390214

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7235358

DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.2.195


Related references

Standardization of inhalation tests influence of method of aerosol generation and inhalation. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 63(3): 165, 1979

Standardization of inhalation provocation tests influence of nebulizer output particle size and method of inhalation. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 67(2): 156-161, 1981

Report of the INTERASMA Working Group on Standardization of Inhalation Provocation Tests in Aspirin-induced Asthma. Oral and inhalation provocation tests for the diagnosis of aspirin-induced asthma. Allergy 56(9): 899-911, 2001

Standardization of Inhalation Provocation Tests. Chest Journal 82(5): 572-575, 1982

Standardization of the carbachol inhalation provocation tests using a reservoir method. Pneumologie 45 Suppl 2: 674-678, 1991

Standardization of inhalation provocation tests. Dose vs concentration of histamine. Chest 82(5): 572-575, 1982

Studies on Inhalation Tests in Bronchial Asthma. (I) Inhalation Provocation Test with House Dust Extract. Arerugi 13: 24-31, 1964

Histamine inhalation tests: inhalation of aerosol via a facemask versus a valve box with mouthpiece. Thorax 39(7): 556-557, 1984

Aerosol Generation by a Spray-Drying Technique Under Coulomb Explosion and Rapid Evaporation for the Preparation of Aerosol Particles for Inhalation Tests. Aerosol Science & Technology 48(7): 698-705, 2014

Effects of inhalation of perfluorocarbon aerosol on oxygenation and pulmonary function compared to PGI2 inhalation in a sheep model of oleic acid-induced lung injury. Intensive Care Medicine 27(5): 889-897, 2001

A novel aerosol inhalation device for pressurized metered dose inhalation aerosols: Gammascintigraphic evaluation of pulmonary deposition profiles and comparison with commercial inhalation devices. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 128(1-2): 55-63, 1996

A novel aerosol inhalation device for pressurized metered dose inhalation aerosols: Gamma scintigraphic evaluation of pulmonary deposition profiles and comparison with commercial inhalation devices. International Journal of Pharmaceutics (Amsterdam) 128(1-2): 55-63, 1996

Occupational asthma due to inhalation of chloramine-T. I. Clinical observations and inhalation-provocation studies. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 64(4): 422-427, 1981

Inhalation Provocation Tests. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 4(03): 224-236, 1983

Exogenous inhalation provocation tests with allergens. Die Medizinische Welt 33(21): 783-784, 1982