+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The great "informed consent" debate: should the disclosure of risks and alternatives by physicians be standard pre-operating procedure?



The great "informed consent" debate: should the disclosure of risks and alternatives by physicians be standard pre-operating procedure?



Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia 72(4): 285-288




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 044648184

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 6854163


Related references

The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Louisiana Law Review 41(1): 9-67, 1980

Certainty ranges facilitated explicit and transparent judgments regarding evidence credibility. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2018

Standard operating procedure for audio visual recording of informed consent: an initiative to facilitate regulatory compliance. Indian Journal of Cancer 51(2): 113-116, 2015

Informed consent does not demand full disclosure of risks. Lancet 2(8340): 58-58, 1983

Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure. Connecticut Medicine 48(6): 407-407, 1984

Chemically dependent physicians and informed consent disclosure. Journal of Addictive Diseases 15(2): 25-42, 1996

Medical risks, disclosure, and liability: slouching toward informed consent. Science, Technology & Human Values 12(3-4): 48-59, 1987

Malpractice: toward a viable disclosure standard for informed consent. Oklahoma Law Review 32(4): 868-890, 1979

Informed consent--a proposed standard for medical disclosure. New York University Law Review 48(3): 548-563, 1973

"Informed consent" and disclosure of risks in medical treatment: some recent developments. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 16(2): 375-379, 1987

"Informed consent" to medical treatment: the Oregon standard of disclosure. Oregon Law Review 57(2): 322-333, 1978

Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides. Bioethics Quarterly 3(3-4): 156-162, 1981

Disclosure of operating practices by managed-care organizations to consumers of healthcare: obligations of informed consent. Journal of Clinical Ethics 9(3): 291-296, 1999

Relevant Information and Informed Consent in Research: In Defense of the Subjective Standard of Disclosure. Science and Engineering Ethics (): -, 2016

Informed consent and disclosure in the physician-patient relationship: expanding obligations for physicians in the United States. Medicine and Law 14(5-6): 429-444, 1995