+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The single breath test in neonates: does pressurization of the pneumotachograph make a difference?



The single breath test in neonates: does pressurization of the pneumotachograph make a difference?



Pediatric Pulmonology 19(5): 299-306



The single breath test for the measurement of respiratory system resistance and compliance in newborns consists of an end inspiratory occlusion which is subsequently released, allowing expiration to proceed through a pneumotachograph (PNT). The measured flow is then integrated to give volume. The simplicity of the test is one of the major reasons for its popularity. However, some investigators have cautioned against the use of an occlusion distal to the PNT because pressurization of the PNT may introduce artifacts in the flow measurement. Despite this caution, many commercial systems use a pressurized PNT. This study investigated the errors that would result from pressurization of the PNT by providing a step function of flow to two infant PNTs, a Fleisch #0 and a Hans Rudolph 4500, in the unpressurized and pressurized state. In each case there was an initial rapid rise of the flow signal, followed by some overshoot and oscillations that rapidly died out. The overshoot and oscillations for the Hans Rudolph PNT were greater when pressurized whereas pressurization had little effect on the Fleisch PNT. Unpressurized, the two were similar. In either case, the artifact introduced by pressurization of the PNT died out so quickly that it would have little effect on any measurement in an infant.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 044751395

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7567205

DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950190509


Related references

Measurement of breath-by-breath gas exchange during general anaesthesia using a single pneumotachograph. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 14(2): 147-152, 1992

Single breath CO measurements normalized to 5% CO2 in Coombs' test positive neonates. Physiological Measurement 28(9): 977-988, 2007

An integrated pneumotachograph system including breath-by-breath measurement of ventilation rate (minute volume). Journal of Physiology 200(2): 92p-94p, 1969

The Influence of Age on Interaction between Breath-Holding Test and Single-Breath Carbon Dioxide Test. Biomed Research International 2017: 1010289, 2017

Timing of the breath analyzer: does it make a difference?. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 54(5): 517-519, 1993

Multi-breath and single breath helium dilution lung volumes as a test of airway obstruction. European Respiratory Journal 3(5): 515-520, 1990

Reliability of aminopyrine breath test using a single breath collection. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 40(7): 1581, 1995

A new single-breath spirometer for neonates. Anesthesia and Analgesia 48(6): 923-927, 1969

Surveillance of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in high-risk neonates--does it make a difference?. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 32(4): 407-409, 2013

13C] breath test of medium-chain triglycerides and oligosaccharides in neonates. Acta Paediatrica Japonica 34(6): 674-677, 1992

Lactose breath hydrogen test results in chinese neonates. Acta Paediatrica Sinica 28(1): 29-34, 1987

Effect of a single breath of 100% oxygen on respiration in neonates during sleep. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology 57(5): 1531-1535, 1984

Measurement of breath amplitudes: comparison of three noninvasive respiratory monitors to integrated pneumotachograph. Pediatric Pulmonology 16(4): 254-258, 1993

Gastric emptying measured noninvasively in neonates with a 13C-glycine breath test. Pediatric Research 41(4 PART 2): 87A, 1997

Effect of a single breath of 100 percent oxygen on respiration in neonates during sleep. Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental & Exercise Physiology 57(5): 1531-1535, 1984