EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Transport across homoporous and heteroporous membranes in nonideal, nondilute solutions. II. Inequality of phenomenological and tracer solute permeabilities



Transport across homoporous and heteroporous membranes in nonideal, nondilute solutions. II. Inequality of phenomenological and tracer solute permeabilities



Biophysical Journal 34(3): 545-557



The phenomenological solute permeability (omega p) of a membrane measures the flux of solute across it when the concentrations of the solutions on the two sides of the membrane differ. The relationship between omega p and the the conventionally measured tracer permeability (omega T) is examined for homoporous and heteroporous (parallel path) membranes in nonideal, nondilute solutions and in the presence of boundary layers. In general, omega p and omega T are not equal; therefore, predictions of transmembrane solute flux based on omega T are always subject to error. For a homoporous membrane, the two permeabilities become equal as the solutions become ideal and dilute. For heteroporous membranes, omega p is always greater than omega T. An upper bound on omega p- omega T is derived to provide an estimate of the maximum error in predicted solute flux. This bound is also used to show that the difference between omega P and omega T demonstrated earlier for the sucrose-Cuprophan system can be explained if the membrane is heteroporous. The expressions for omega P developed here support the use of a modified osmotic driving force to describe membrane transport in nonideal, nondilute solutions.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 044842314

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7248474

DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84867-9



Related references

Transport across homoporous and heteroporous membranes in nonideal, nondilute solutions. I. Inequality of reflection coefficients for volume flow and solute flow. Biophysical Journal 34(3): 535-544, 1981

Osmotic transport across cell membranes in nondilute solutions: a new nondilute solute transport equation. Biophysical Journal 96(7): 2559-2571, 2009

In vivo large and small solute peritoneal clearances Homoporous or heteroporous-like transport?. Journal Of The American Society Of Nephrology. 4(3): 400, 1993

Membrane reflection coefficients for volume flow and solute flow are not equal in nonideal nondilute solutions. Biophysical Journal 33(2 PART 2): 5A, 1981

Asymptotic solutions for solute transport: a formalism for tracer tomography. Water Resources Research 35(1): 1-16, 1999

Tracer permeabilities under estimate trans membrane solute flux under a concentration gradient. Journal of Membrane Science 8(3): 247-254, 1981

Solute transport under nonideal conditions. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 70(15): 342, 1989

A biomechanical triphasic approach to the transport of nondilute solutions in articular cartilage. Biophysical Journal 97(12): 3054-3064, 2010

Solute size and nonideal transport in structured porous media. Agronomy Abstracts 85: 202, 1993

Preparation of collagen-gel flat membranes with various microstructures and solute permeabilities. Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs 27(1): 244-249, 1998

Non-electrolyte solute permeabilities of human placental microvillous and basal membranes. Journal of Physiology 468: 261-274, 1993

Nonideal transport of solute and colloidal tracers through reactive zeolite/iron pellets. Water Resources Research 40(4): W04207, 2004

Cholesterol content and water and solute permeabilities of kidney membranes from aging rats. American Journal of Physiology 253(1 Pt 2): R8-14, 1987