+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients



A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients



Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 18(6): 438-446



Visual analogue scales (VAS) and verbal rating scales (VRS) are widely used to assess pain. This paper presents a secondary analysis of a subsection of data collected as part of an evaluation of an intervention to improve nighttime pain. The aims were to describe the relationship between the VAS and VRS; to compare characteristics of the noncompliant groups in terms of age, gender, type of surgery, and analgesics; to explore the reasons for noncompletion of the VAS or VRS; and to determine the noncompliance rates with each assessment scale. Worst and average pain scores were obtained for the second postoperative night for 417 patients. Fifty-nine patients (14.2%) did not complete the VAS. In contrast, two patients did not complete the VRS (0.5%). The scores generated from the VAS and VRS correlated well, although the range of VAS scores corresponding to each VRS category was wide. We conclude that the VRS was more suitable for use in this clinical setting.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 045056498

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10641470


Related references

Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 41(6): 1073-1093, 2011

Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 11(2): 123-127, 1989

Comparison of Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS) as Assessment Tools of Pain Intensity and Pain Unpleasantness. PhysioTherapy 82(11): 638-0, 1996

The Assessment of Acute Pain in Pre-Hospital Care Using Verbal Numerical Rating and Visual Analogue Scales. Journal of Emergency Medicine 49(3): 287-293, 2015

A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 7(4): 196-203, 1992

Problems associated with pain measurement in arthritis: comparison of the visual analogue and verbal rating scales. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2(3): 231-234, 1984

Comparability of visual analogue and verbal rating scales in measuring the pain of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 35(9 Suppl. ): S176, 1992

Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 5: 31, 2005

Pain measurement scales: a comparison of the visual analogue and faces rating scales in measuring pressure ulcer pain. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing 28(6): 290-296, 2001

Self-rating scales in schizophrenia: assessment of the practical applicability of the Paranoid-Depression Scale (PD-S), the Frankfurt Self-feeling Scale (FBS) and of two visual analogue scales. Psychiatria Polska 37(2): 315-335, 2003

Verbal numerical scales are as reliable and sensitive as visual analog scales for rating dyspnea in young and older subjects. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology 157(2-3): 360-365, 2007

Visual analogue scales vas compared to simple descriptive scales sds in ulcerative colitis trials. Gastroenterology 92(5 Part 2): 1409, 1987

Repeatability and reproducibility of numerical rating scales and visual analogue scales for canine pruritus severity scoring. Veterinary Dermatology 18(5): 294-300, 2007

Preconditions for sensitivity in measuring change: visual analogue scales compared to rating scales in a Likert format. Psychological Reports 77(2): 475-480, 1995

Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs. Veterinary Surgery 36(4): 360-367, 2007