+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study



Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study



Radiographics 18(3): 745-754



Conventional screen-film radiography does not display all regions of the thorax satisfactorily. Three chest radiographic techniques display both the lung and the mediastinum with good contrast. These techniques are asymmetric screen-film (ASF), digital storage phosphor (DSP), and digital selenium drum (DSD) imaging. ASF systems use two asymmetric screen-film combinations to produce a wide-latitude image of the thorax with good contrast in the lungs. In DSP systems, image data are acquired digitally with a wide dynamic range by using the optical output of a photostimulable phosphor plate; in DSD systems, the wide-range digital image data are acquired by using the electronic charge generated on a drum coated with a thin layer of amorphous selenium. The appearance of a DSP or DSD radiograph is then determined by user-selected image processing operations: tone scaling, spatial frequency processing, and dynamic range compensation. Digital chest radiographs processed with strong regional equalization provide both excellent contrast in the lungs and effective display of the mediastinum and chest wall. At visual comparison, the high lung contrast and good mediastinal, retrocardiac, and subdiaphragmatic detail provided by the DSD method distinguish it from the other two methods.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 045501839

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9599395

DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599395


Related references

Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems. Radiology 186(2): 387-393, 1993

Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD). Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift für Radiologische Technik 54(4): 123-126, 2002

Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique. Rofo 172(12): 965-968, 2001

Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease by digital selenium radiography, storage phosphor radiography, and a asymmetric and a symmetric film-screen system-aspects of dose reduction. European Respiratory Journal Suppl. 10(25): 389S, Sept, 1997

Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography. Radiology 195(1): 259-263, 1995

Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems. Acta Radiologica 37(3 Pt 1): 332-336, 1996

Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 32(5): 322-326, 2004

Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Clinical Imaging 36(4): 279-286, 2012

Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images. British Journal of Radiology 78(934): 922-927, 2005

A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 11(1): E009-E016, 2010

ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography. Aktuelle Radiologie 5(4): 263-267, 1995

Endodontic working length assessment: Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 85(3): 325-328, 1998

Detectability of pulmonary nodule in chest phantom comparison of digital image and screen film image. Chung-Ang Journal of Medicine 13(2): 313-324, 1988

Comparison of Image Quality Criteria between Digital Storage Phosphor Plate in Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 19(1): 52-59, 2012

Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination. Rofo 166(2): 101-107, 1997