+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative study on the acceptance and use of contraceptive methods in a rural population in Kelantan



Comparative study on the acceptance and use of contraceptive methods in a rural population in Kelantan



Malaysian Journal of Reproductive Health 8(2): 66-71



Contraceptive prevalence was determined in the Kelantan region of Malaysia, an area with relatively poor health indices. 350 women attending health clinics on rubber and palm-oil estates and living in surrounding suburbs were surveyed by clinic workers or during home visits. The sample included 273 Malays, 64 Indians and 13 Chinese. This area of Peninsular Malaysia is noted for the highest infant mortality rate (17.7), second highest crude birth rate (35.2) and highest dependency ratio (88%) in the country. 44.9% practiced contraception, highest in Chinese and lowest in Indians. Methods used were pills by (55%), traditional methods (19%), tubal ligation (18%), safe period (14%), injections (5.5%), IUD (4.7%), and condom (2.3%). The Malaysian traditional methods are herbal preparations from tree bark or roots, herb pills, and exercises after coitus. 34% of the non contraceptors had used contraception before but stopped because of side effects, religious or spousal objections, or desire to conceive. 74% had married in their teens. 46% of the non-contraceptors were spacing their children by prolonged breastfeeding.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 045586528

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12343150


Related references

Predictors of men's acceptance of modern contraceptive practice: study in rural Vietnam. Health Education and Behavior 32(6): 738-750, 2005

A comparative study on attitude of contraceptive methods users towards common contraceptive methods. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 15(Suppl 1): 363-370, 2010

Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 84(5): 493-498, 2011

Comparative operational study of 2 methods of population survey in rural areas of thailand. International Journal Of Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial DiseasesSuppl.: 333-334, 1979

A comparative evaluation of oral contraceptive use and associated compliance issues in a rural population. Clinical Therapeutics. 17(3): 541-551, 1995

Acceptance and non-acceptance of birth control methods and associated facts in rural areas of Midnapur district of West Bengal. Man in India 63(4): 379-385, 1983

An evaluation of male contraceptive acceptance in rural Ghana. Studies in Family Planning 9(8): 222-226, 1978

The influence of health care on contraceptive acceptance in rural Mexico. Studies in Family Planning 18(3): 144-156, 1987

Contraceptive use amongst urban and rural youths in South Africa--a comparative study. Curationis 13(3-4): 44-48, 1990

Population mobility and rural households in North Kelantan, Malaysia. In: Population mobility and development: Southeast Asia and the Pacific (Edited by G.W. Jones, H.V. Richter). Monograph, Development Studies Centre, Australian National University (27): 93-115, 1981

A field study of the choice and continuity of use of 3 contraceptive methods in a rural area of thailand. Journal of Biosocial Science 10(2): 109-216, 1978

A field study of the choice and continuity of use of three contraceptive methods in a rural area of Thailand. Journal of Biosocial Science 10(2): 209-216, 1978

Motivations, acceptance and refusal of contraceptive methods. Bulletin de l'Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale 23(6): 1333-1346, 1968

Acceptance and use of contraceptive methods in Rwanda in 1991. Imbonezamuryango 1992(23): 15-18, 1992

Acceptance and Continuation of Contraceptive Methods Immediate Postabortion. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 82(1): 86-95, 2017