+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comprehensive critical incident monitoring in a neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit: experience with the system approach

Comprehensive critical incident monitoring in a neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit: experience with the system approach

Intensive Care Medicine 26(1): 69-74

To examine the occurrence of critical incidents (CIs) in order to improve quality of care. Prospective survey. Multidisciplinary, neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) of a non-university, teaching children's hospital. Four hundred and sixty-seven admissions over a 1-year period. A CI is any event which could have reduced, or did reduce, the safety margin for the patient. Comprehensive, anonymous, non-punitive CI monitoring was undertaken. CI severity with respect to actual patient harm was graded: major (score 3), moderate (2) or minor (1). The system approach incorporates the philosophy that errors are evidence of deficiencies in systems, not in people. We undertook 2-monthly analyses of CIs. There were 211 CI reports: 30 % major, 25 % moderate, 45 % minor. The CI categories were management/environment 29 %, drugs 29 %, procedures 18 %, respiration 14 %, equipment dysfunction 7 %, nosocomial infections 3 %. The respiratory CIs were the most severe, the drug-related CIs the least severe (score mean, SD: 2.9, 0.26 vs 1.4, 0.76; p < 0.001). However, 20 out of 62 drug-related CIs were potentially life-threatening. Thirteen percent of drug CIs were decimal point errors. Eleven of the 29 respiratory CIs were accidental extubations (2.6/100 ventilator days). CIs were most often precipitated by consultants (32 %), followed by residents (23 %, over-represented in drug CIs, 22/62) and specialized nurses (21 %). Doctors had a greater proportion of major CIs than nurses (p < 0.01). Fifty percent of the CIs were detected by routine checks. The most important method of detection was patient inspection (44 %), alarms accounted for only 10 %. Contributing factors were human errors (63 %), communication failure (14 %), organizational problems (10 %), equipment dysfunction (7 %) and milieu (3 %). CIs are very common in pediatric intensive care. Knowledge of them is a precious source for quality improvement through changes in the system.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 045609063

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10663283

DOI: 10.1007/s001340050014

Related references

Learning from a critical incident reporting system in the pediatric intensive care unit. Der Anaesthesist 64(12): 968-974, 2015

Critical incident monitoring in pediatric hematology/oncology Encouraging experience using the system approach. Pediatric Research 49(4 Part 2): 216A, 2001

Debriefing in the intensive care unit: a personal experience of critical incident stress. Nursing in Critical Care 5(2): 82-86, 2001

EEG monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit: a critical juncture. Clinical Neurophysiology 122(10): 1905-1907, 2011

Anonymous critical incident reporting system. Implementation in an intensive care unit. Der Anaesthesist 57(9): 926-932, 2008

The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. The development and evaluation of an incident reporting system in intensive care. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 24(3): 314-319, 1996

Parents' Wishes for What They Had or Had Not Done and Their Coping After Their Infant's or Child's Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Pediatric Intensive Care Unit/Emergency Department Death. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing 2019, 2019

Therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonatal intensive care unit: experience in 68 newborns. Journal of ChemoTherapy 19 Suppl 2: 39-41, 2008

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Gentamicin in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Experience in 68 Newborns. Journal of ChemoTherapy 19(Sup2): 39-41, 2007

Preliminary experience of environmental monitoring using sponge swabs on a neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Hospital Infection 83(3): 266-267, 2013

Feeding Problems of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Graduates Perceptions of Parents and Providers. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews 12(4), 2012

Does pediatric housestaff experience influence tests ordered for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit?. Critical Care Medicine 25(4): 704-709, 1997

An expert system EEG Monitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 106(6): 488-500, 1998

An expert system for EEG monitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 106(6): 488-500, 1998

Monitoring system of the pulmonary function changes in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 17(SUPPL 1): 116, 1989