+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cost analysis in a population based screening programme for colorectal cancer: comparison of immunochemical and guaiac faecal occult blood testing



Cost analysis in a population based screening programme for colorectal cancer: comparison of immunochemical and guaiac faecal occult blood testing



Journal of Medical Screening 4(3): 142-146



To compare the costs of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by two faecal occult blood tests (FOBT)-namely, Hemoccult (guaiac based) and reversed passive haemagglutination (RPHA) tests. RPHA was interpreted according to two positivity thresholds (+ or +/-). Attenders performed both tests. Subjects with a positive FOBT test were invited to have a complete exploration of the colon. The total costs for every 10,000 screened subjects and costs for each unit of result (screened subject, or patient with adenoma/s or cancer detected) were calculated for both tests. 8353 subjects were enrolled. A total of 2109 repeated screening after two years. RPHA(+ and +/-) showed the highest and RPHA(+) the lowest positivity rate at first screening. The Hemoccult positivity rate was highest at repeat screening. Total costs of screening by RPHA(+ and +/-) were highest as this method had the highest recall rate. Screening by RPHA(+) was the least costly. Costs for each screened subject were highest for RPHA(+ and +/-) and lowest for RPHA(+). Costs for each cancer detected were lowest for RPHA(+) and highest for Hemoccult or RPHA(+ and +/-) in subjects aged > 49 or < 50, respectively. Costs for subjects with detected adenoma/s of > 9 mm were lowest for RPHA(+ and +/-) and highest for Hemoccult. At repeat screening total costs of RPHA(+ and +/-) were lower than at first screening, whereas for each subject with cancer or adenoma/s costs were increased. Our data confirm that screening by RPHA is more cost effective than by Hemoccult.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 045659936

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9368871

DOI: 10.1177/096914139700400306


Related references

Immunochemical vs guaiac faecal occult blood tests in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer 74(1): 141-144, 1996

Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population. Gut 56(2): 210-214, 2007

Immunochemical testing of individuals positive for guaiac faecal occult blood test in a screening programme for colorectal cancer: an observational study. Lancet. Oncology 7(2): 127-131, 2006

M1013 a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Colorectal Cancer Screening Comparing Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Tests with Guaiac Faecal Occult Blood Tests and No Screening. Gastroenterology 136(5): A-331, 2009

Implementation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to the specimens flow in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests: a quality improvement project in the Milan colorectal cancer screening programme. Bmj Open Quality 7(1): E000299, 2018

Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut 59(1): 62-68, 2010

Comparison between a guaiac and three immunochemical faecal occult blood tests in screening for colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer 48(16): 2969-2976, 2012

Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know. Gut 64(8): 1327-1337, 2015

Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy. European Journal of Cancer 46(11): 2059-2066, 2010

Participation in four rounds of a French colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac faecal occult blood test: a population-based open cohort study. Journal of Medical Screening 22(2): 76-82, 2015

Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Bmj Open 7(10): E017186, 2017

Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening (KCIS 16). Journal of Medical Screening 14(4): 191-199, 2007

Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing. Bmc Cancer 15: 705, 2015

Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial). European Journal of Cancer 45(18): 3282-3290, 2009

An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical faecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening programme. Colorectal Disease 15(9): E512-E521, 2013