+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?

Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?

American Criminal Law Review 18(4): 591-615

The Supreme Court in 1973 in Roe v. Wade established that decision of first trimester abortion is left to the physician, exercising his best medical judgment, in consultation with the patient. During this period the state may not regulate abortion determination since there is no compelling state interest; therefore a physician performing abortion will be precluded from civil or criminal liability. In second trimester abortion the state has a compelling interest in the health of the mother and may regulate the procedure to protect maternal health; although a previable fetus may be able to survive the abortion, Roe v. Danforth definitively places the woman's right to an abortion above the life of the fetus during the previable stage; therefore the state cannot seek to safeguard the life or health of the fetus during the abortion. Third trimester abortion implies a viable fetus; thus, a compelling state interest in the potential life arises and the state may regulate and proscribe abortion except when necessary for the life and health of the mother. The determination of when viability has been achieved is a matter of judgment resting with the physician who has the choice of techniques and operating procedures which may or may not be fatal to the unborn. It is a question of either termination of pregnancy or destruction of the fetus. In this last case the legal responsibility placed upon the physician is very serious, and involving a risk of civil and criminal liability. Uncertainties as to the boundaries of legal abortion and the threat of criminal liability can only result in a reluctance among physicians to perform second and third trimester abortions, which is against the fundamental right to abortion guaranteed by the Constitution. The Supreme Court will have to elaborate upon the scope of the abortion right, whether it encompasses fetal destruction or only termination of pregnancy, because it directly affects the extent and quality of maternal and fetal care that must be rendered by a physician. If only termination of pregnancy is included the Court must resolve whether the woman's health interests predominate, or whether the physician can be required to enhance fetal survival. Physicians have a right to know the full extent of legal ramifications and implications of legally induced abortion.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 045670417

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11655468

Related references

No criminal liability of contract physicians for bribery. Rofo 184(12): 1197-1200, 2013

On "bringing on the menses": the criminal liability of women and the therapeutic exception in Canadian abortion law. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 1(2): 279-312, 1986

Physicians as Criminal Defendants: Specialty, Sanctions, and Status Liability. Law and Human Behavior 13(2): 231-236, 1989

Criminal and civil liability of physicians for institutional elder abuse and neglect. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2(4): 155-159, 2003

Italian law n. 24/2017 on physicians’ criminal liability: a reform that does not solve the problems of the psychiatric practice. Rivista di Psichiatria 52(6): 213-219, 2018

Physicians' challenges under El Salvador's criminal abortion prohibition. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 143(1): 121-126, 2018

Contribution of Bavarian physicians to the prevention of criminal abortion. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 95(17): 509-511, 1953

Encephalopathy subsequent to criminal abortion; (1) development of dementia in brain disease caused by criminal abortion; (2) anatomical findings in a case of rapid death. Revue Neurologique 94(5): 736-743, 1956

Criminal liability of physicians and other health care professionals in Hungary (review of case law between 1996-2000). Medicine and Law 25(4): 593-599, 2007

An analysis of criminal liability in a criminal case involving an epileptic. Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi 22(6): 358-60, 383, 1989

Beginners' operations and medical specialist standards : Avoidance of criminal liability and civil liability. Der Urologe. Ausg. a 2018, 2018

Is mama a criminal? An analysis of potential criminal liability of HIV-infected pregnant women in the context of mandated drug therapy. Drake Law Review 50(2): 293-314, 2003

Studies on the incidence of causes of abortion with reference to criminal abortion. An analysis of 3033 cases of abortion at the Universitaets-Frauenklinik Giessen from the years 1945 to 1960. Medizinische Klinik 56: 821-830, 1961

Frequency of criminal abortion. Elucidated in interviews of women hospitalized for abortion. Ugeskrift for Laeger 135(14): 770-771, 1973

Anaphylaxis a liability risk, advises letter from PLICO (Physicians Liability Insurance Company). Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association 81(9): 579-579, 1988