+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effect of radiographic quality on computer-assisted head penetration measurements



Effect of radiographic quality on computer-assisted head penetration measurements



Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2001(386): 150-158



Even the most sophisticated computer-assisted radiographic techniques of measuring femoral head penetration into the polyethylene liner depend on the quality of the radiograph being evaluated, which varies greatly in clinical settings. The authors of this study sought to determine how the accuracy and reproducibility of three commercially available computer-assisted measurement systems differed when measuring optimal radiographs (with sharply defined component edges) and suboptimal radiographs (with less well defined edges). Using three computer-assisted measurement systems, the authors measured head penetration on simulated and clinical hip radiographs. All systems calculated head penetration as the movement of the head center relative to the cup center. To define the periphery of the prosthetic head and cup, one method (System One) used the human eye and a digitizing tablet, whereas the other two methods (System Two and System Three) used digital edge detection algorithms. For simulated hip radiographs, error was calculated as the absolute value of the difference between the known amount of head penetration, determined by a coordinate measuring machine, and the amount of penetration determined by the software. Three way analysis of variance showed a significant difference in absolute error among the three measurement techniques. System One had a significantly smaller absolute error (0.11 +/- 0.06 mm) than did System Two (0.25 +/- 0.25 mm) and System Three (0.19 +/- 0.13 mm). In addition, three-way analysis of variance showed that optimal radiographs were associated with a significantly lower absolute error (0.14 +/- 0.09 mm) than were suboptimal radiographs (0.23 +/- 0.22 mm). For optimal radiographs, there was no significant difference in error among the three measurement methods; all systems were accurate and reproducible. However, for suboptimal radiographs absolute error increased and varied widely, and a significant difference among the methods existed. These data show the susceptibility of head penetration measurements to radiographic technique and underscore the importance of good quality radiographs for all analyses of head penetration.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 045889216

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11347828

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200105000-00019


Related references

Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 49(6): 523-528, 2011

A comparison of radiographic and computer-assisted measurements of thoracic and thoracolumbar sagittal curvature. Skeletal Radiology 19(1): 21-26, 1990

A computer-assisted method for making linear radiographic measurements using stored regions of interest. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 19(7): 441-448, 1992

Computer-assisted quality assurance for radiographic equipment. Medical Physics 7(4): 386-388, 1980

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements. American Journal of Sports Medicine 42(10): 2393-2401, 2014

The determination of linear and angular penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement: a comparison of four computer-assisted methods. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 90(7): 839-846, 2008

Effect of soft tissues on radiographic measurements of the head. Journal of Dental Research 53(1): 104-107, 1974

Touch screen computer-assisted health-related quality of life and distress data collection in head and neck cancer patients. Clinical Otolaryngology 33(2): 138-142, 2008

Intraoperative Measurements of Joint Line Changes Using Computer Navigation Do Not Correlate With Postoperative Radiographic Measurements in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 32(1): 61-65, 2016

Effect of nuclear cataracts on visual function Cone threshold measurements using computer assisted perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 37(3): S759, 1996

Penetration quality measurement for standardization of radiographic image quality. Medical Physics 2(1): 5-8, 1975

Radiographic evaluation of penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner over time. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 79(7): 1040-1046, 1997

Computer assisted methods in reconstructive and function-preserving orbital surgery. New capabilities of computer assisted preoperative surgical planning (CAPP) and computer assisted surgery (CAS). Hno 53(5): 428-438, 2004

Computer-assisted interpretation in radiographic diagnosis. Dental Clinics of North America 37(4): 683-696, 1993

Differences in the rates of penetration determined from radiographic and shadowgraphic measurements of acetabular sockets. Journal of Arthroplasty 13(5): 570-575, 1998