+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluating interventions that promote the use of rear seats for children



Evaluating interventions that promote the use of rear seats for children



American Journal of Preventive Medicine 16(1 Suppl): 23-29



To evaluate interventions that promote the use of the rear seat among children riding in motor vehicles. Using the Cochrane Collaboration search strategy, we searched in electronic databases and reference lists of past reviews and review articles. We also searched among studies from government and research agencies in the United States and abroad, and contacted experts in the field. Studies for selection had to be evaluations of interventions in defined populations, with a clear description of the program and the outcomes evaluated. Outcomes had to be measured in an objective manner, and there needed to be a comparison group. Six studies met the selection criteria. Changes in the proportion of observed children traveling in the rear seats before and after the implementation of the intervention were the main outcome of interest. Two studies evaluating the effectiveness of educational campaigns promoting the use of the rear seat found increases in the proportion of children riding in the rear seats, but only in one study were the increases statistically significant (from 86% to 91%). The four remaining studies reported changes in seating location as a side effect of legislation requiring child restraint use among children traveling in the front seats. In two of these four studies, the percentage of children riding in the rear seats significantly increased from 49% to 62% and from 88% to 98%. In the remaining two studies there were small, but not statistically significant, changes in the proportion of children riding in the rear seats, with percentages remaining around 60% and 85%. Interventions aimed at promoting the use of rear seats by children traveling in motor vehicles have been rare. Only one educational program whose only objective was to promote rear seating location was found and this 1973 Danish study had a positive impact. The other educational campaign, a pilot program that also focused on improving child restraint use, had no significant impact in promoting seating of children in the rear. We did not find any evaluation of legislation prohibiting children to sit in the front seats. Legislation requiring proper child restraint use in the front seats (and thus, compelling unrestrained children to seat in the rear) has produced, for the most part, a nonsignificant increase in the proportions of children sitting in the rear.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046003277

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9921383

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00118-4


Related references

Reduced protection for belted occupants in rear seats relative to front seats of new model year vehicles. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference 54: 149-158, 2010

Car safety seats for children: rear facing for best protection. Injury Prevention 13(6): 398-402, 2007

Advise use of rear facing child car seats for children under 4 years old. Bmj 338: B1994, 2009

Experimental injury study of children seated behind collapsing front seats in rear impacts. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 39: 259-265, 2003

A risky treat: exploring parental perceptions of the barriers to seating their children in the rear seats of passenger vehicles. Injury Prevention 13(2): 105-109, 2007

Multivariate head injury threshold measures for various sized children seated behind vehicle seats in rear impacts. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 40: 381-386, 2004

Crash analysis of lower extremity injuries in children restrained in forward-facing car seats during front and rear impacts. Journal of Trauma 61(3): 592-597, 2006

The economic benefits of child safety seat misuse reduction programs and design improvements for children in rear seats. Annual Proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 51: 197-206, 2007

Evaluation of a community-based intervention to promote rear seating for children. American Journal of Public Health 94(6): 1009-1013, 2004

Rear-facing car safety seats: getting the message right. Pediatrics 121(3): 619-620, 2008

Comparison of three-point belt fit between humans and ATDs in rear seats. Traffic Injury Prevention 19(Sup1): S65-S69, 2018

Three-Dimensional Mathematical Models of the BioRID I and Car Seats, for Low-Speed Rear-End Impacts. Traffic Injury Prevention 3(1): 75-87, 2002

Looking Back on Rear-Facing Car Seats: Surveying US Parents in 2011 and 2013. Academic Pediatrics 15(5): 526-533, 2016

Evaluating worksite-based interventions that promote safety belt use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18(4 Suppl ): 11-22, 2000

A statistical model including age to predict passenger postures in the rear seats of automobiles. Ergonomics 59(6): 796-805, 2016