+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of homologous bone graft versus biomaterials in the aesthetic restoration of the middle third of the face



Evaluation of homologous bone graft versus biomaterials in the aesthetic restoration of the middle third of the face



Minerva Chirurgica 57(3): 283-287



Bone deficits of the midface can be observed following tumor surgery, facial traumas or malformations, and can determine aesthetic deformities requiring surgical corrections. The goal of this study is to illustrate the 23 years experience of the Maxillo-Facial Department of the "La Sapienza" University of Rome, in surgical correction of middle third bone loss for aesthetic improvement, and to compare postsurgical results from the use of biomaterials and homologous bone grafts. From January 1977 to January 2000, 18 patients were surgically treated with bone grafts for bone deficit of the midface requiring aesthetic improvements, and 23 received biomaterial placement in the same district. A retrospective analysis regarding aesthetic improvements following corrective (reconstructive) surgery was carried out in order to compare long-term results obtained with bone grafts and biomaterials. Of the 19 implants of the zygomatic bone, 1 patient suffered from infection, observ-ed on the 8th day, following iliac bone graft in the maxillary area. Of the 32 prostheses, 7 became infected and in 1 case the material became exposed: Proplast(R) became infected 2 times, Gore-tex(R) 3 times and 1 time became exposed; 2 of the 24 Medpor(R) implants resulted in infection. The employment of bone graft obtained a good short term aesthetic result. Medpor(R) employment, was evaluated as an optimal aesthetic improvement. We cannot evaluate the results obtained with Gore-tex(R) and Proplast(R) because of the few cases treated. Anyway we consider unsatisfactory the corrections obtained with these 2 materials. Homologous bone grafts are still considered as the best choice when a further fixture positioning is planned for prosthetic rehabilitation of the alveolar ridge of the upper jaw or mandible. At the present time, some biomaterials are the definitive solution for restoring facial harmony in the 3 spatial dimensions.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046010360

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12029221


Related references

Histological Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Granules with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma versus an Autologous Bone Graft: Comparative study of biomaterials used for spinal fusion in a New Zealand white rabbit model. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal 16(4): E422-E429, 2016

Aesthetic outcome of implant-supported restoration of unilateral missing maxillary central incisor using guided bone regeneration and connective tissue graft procedures. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 50(11): 685-689, 2016

Hydroxyapatite-Based Biomaterials Versus Autologous Bone Graft in Spinal Fusion: An In Vivo Animal Study. Spine 39(11): E661-E668, 2014

New Techniques in Relation to New Concepts of the Aesthetic of the Face: Technical Considerations and Aesthetic Evaluation. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 27(7): E693-E695, 2016

Clinical evaluation of structural fat tissue graft (Lipostructure) in volumetric facial restoration with face-lift. About 100 cases. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique 49(5): 437-455, 2004

Aesthetic Restoration of the Severely Disfigured Face in Burn Victims. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 96(7): 1573-1585, 1995

T-cell depletion for bone marrow transplantation: effects on graft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, graft-versus-leukemia, and survival. Cancer Treatment and Research 50: 99-111, 1990

Ligation of 4-1BB (CDw137) regulates graft-versus-host disease, graft-versus-leukemia, and graft rejection in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients. Journal of Immunology 166(5): 3174-3183, 2001

Aesthetic restoration of the severely disfigured face in burn victims: a comprehensive strategy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 96(7): 1573-85; Discussion 1586-7, 1995

Restoration of the face covering by means of selected skin in regional aesthetic units. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 9(3): 212-221, 1956

Graft versus graft and graft versus host reactions after HLA-identical bone marrow transplantation in a patient with severe combined immunodeficiency with transplacentally acquired lymphoid chimerism. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 2(3): 111-116, 1991

Double haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation results in successful engraftment of bone marrow from both donors without graft-versus-host or graft-versus-graft effects. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 18(12): 1808-1818, 2013

To Graft or Not to Graft? Treating Vertical Bone Defects in the Aesthetic Zone. Dentistry Today 34(10): 114, 116, 118-9, 2015

Double Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation HSCT Results In Successful Engraftment Of Bone Marrow From Both Donors Without Graft Versus Host Or Graft Versus Graft Effects. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 17(2-supp-S): 0, 2011

Combined aesthetic interventions for prevention of facial ageing, and restoration and beautification of face and body. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 10: 423-429, 2017