+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

General practitioner fundholding and prescribing expenditure control. Evidence from a rural English health authority



General practitioner fundholding and prescribing expenditure control. Evidence from a rural English health authority



Pharmacoeconomics 11(4): 350-358



In April 1991, the fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes introduced budgets for expenditure on prescribed drugs into UK general practice. Although both schemes were designed to be equally effective at containing prescribing-cost inflation, several studies suggest that expenditure growth has been lower in fundholding practices, compared with nonfundholding practices. This study attempts to ascertain how fundholding practices control their expenditure by examining data from a rural English health authority for the financial year 1993 to 1994. The fundholding practices sampled were found to control their expenditure through: (i) reduced overprescribing; (ii) using fewer drugs that have limited clinical value; (iii) substituting similar, but less expensive, drugs; (iv) more generic prescribing; and (v) appropriate use of expensive preparations. However, whether the cost differential between fundholding and nonfundholding practices is sustained in future years will depend upon: (i) the ability of fundholding practices to generate further savings; (ii) the characteristics of the practices that enter the fundholding scheme in subsequent waves; (iii) the way in which the scheme is organised; and (iv) the level at which budgets are set.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046157815

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10166409


Related references

GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice: evidence from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities. Public Health 111(5): 321-325, 1997

Antibiotic policies--relevance to general practitioner prescribing. Family Health Services Authority, Great Britain. Journal of Antimicrobial ChemoTherapy 33 Suppl A: 131-135, 1994

General practice fundholding and health care costs. Fundholding has curbed increases in prescribing costs. Bmj 315(7110): 748-749, 1997

General practitioner fundholding: weighing the evidence. Lancet 346(8983): 1139-1142, 1995

Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. Bmj 313(7057): 595-599, 1996

General practitioner fundholding in the reformed National Health Service: a descriptive analysis. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 19(2): 75-83, 1996

Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs. Bmj 307(6913): 1186-1189, 1993

General practice fundholding and health care costs. Fundholding seems not to be implicated in rise in emergency admissions. Bmj 315(7110): 749, 1997

General practice fundholding and health care costs. Fundholding gives choice of alternatives if local service is poor. Bmj 315(7110): 749, 1997

Issues in general practitioner authority in the National Health Service. Sociological Review Monograph 1976(22): 23-42, 1976

The general practitioner and local authority personal health services. Journal. Royal Sanitary Institute 75(2): 106-109, 1955

General practitioner fundholding. Bmj 301(6762): 1218-1219, 1990

The general practitioner, the the local health authority, and the prevention of mental disorder. British Journal of Clinical Practice 15: 147-151, 1961

General practice fundholding in the UK National Health Service: evidence to date. Journal of Public Health Policy 17(3): 331-346, 1996

Prescribing incentive scheme for non-fundholding general practices. Reduction in prescribing cannot confidently be attributed to scheme. Bmj 313(7070): 1484, 1996