+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A Matched Case-Control Study on Open and Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms



A Matched Case-Control Study on Open and Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms



Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 107(3): 236-243



To compare early and late results of open and endovascular management of popliteal artery aneurysm in a retrospective single-center matched case-control study Methods: From 1981 to 2015, 309 consecutive interventions for popliteal artery aneurysm were performed in our institution, in 59 cases with endovascular repair and in 250 cases with open repair. Endovascular repair was preferred in older asymptomatic patients, while open repair was offered more frequently to patients with a thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm and a poor run-off status. A one-to-one coarsened exact matching on the basis of the baseline demographic, clinical, and anatomical covariates significantly different between the two treatment options was performed and two equivalent groups of 56 endovascular repairs and open repairs were generated. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative results with χ2 test and of follow-up outcomes with the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of perioperative outcomes. Median duration of follow-up was 38 months. Five-year survival rates were 94% in endovascular repair group and 89.5% in open repair group (p = 0.4, log-rank 0.6). Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 78%, and 72% in endovascular repair group and 82.5%, 80%, and 64% in open repair group (p = 0.8, log-rank 0.01). Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 65.5% in endovascular repair group and 76% in open repair group (p = 0.2, log-rank 1.2). Secondary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94%, 86%, and 74% in endovascular repair group, and 94%, 89%, and 71% in open repair group, respectively (p = 0.9, log-rank 0.01). The rates of limb preservation at 5 years were 94% in endovascular repair group and 86.4% in open repair group (p = 0.3, log-rank 0.8). Open repair and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms provided in this retrospective single-center experience similar perioperative and follow-up results in equivalent groups of patients.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046167948

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29291700

DOI: 10.1177/1457496917748230


Related references

Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms: is the technique a valid alternative to open surgery?. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 48(3): 275-279, 2007

Comparison of early and midterm results of open and endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms. Annals of Vascular Surgery 26(6): 809-818, 2012

Decision analysis model of open repair versus endovascular treatment in patients with asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 59(3): 651-662, 2014

Open and Endovascular Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms. Annals of Vascular Surgery: -, 2018

Open versus endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 51(1): 271-276, 2010

Regarding: "Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms: results of a prospective cohort study". Journal of Vascular Surgery 42(5): 1040-1; Author Reply 1041, 2005

Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms: Results of a prospective cohort study. Yearbook of Vascular Surgery 2007: 225-226, 2007

Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms: results of a prospective cohort study. Journal of Vascular Surgery 41(4): 561-567, 2005

Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study. Yearbook of Diagnostic Radiology 2006: 275-281, 2006

The medial versus the posterior approach in the repair of popliteal artery aneurysms: a multicenter case-matched study. Journal of Vascular Surgery 46(1): 24-30, 2007

Meta-analysis of open and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 65(1): 246-256.E2, 2017

Open and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms: tabular review of the literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery 27(2): 259-265, 2013

A multicentric experience with open surgical repair and endovascular exclusion of popliteal artery aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 45(4): 357-363, 2013

Endovascular versus open repair of popliteal artery aneurysms: outcomes in the US Medicare population. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 47(4): 267-273, 2013

Endovascular versus Open Repair of Asymptomatic Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 27(5): 715-722, 2016